You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Global Sea Ice Area - This chart should worry you...
Man, in his infinite wisdom, has only been tracking weather for a little over 100 years...of the billions of years Earth has been in existence...this thing they call "science" is educated guesswork at best, especially as it applies to vastly changing weather patterns and cycles...their own "evidence" suggests that Earth goes through "warming trends" for decades before a new "ice age" occurs...yet they all seem to want to forget that as they overstate faulty "facts" to drive the fear campaign that we should all surrender more of our money to help them solve a non-existent problem...I, for one, am not buying it...and I am sure I am in the minority...and that is fine with me...followers make up the flock!
If you are a "science" denier then I don't think we have much of a discussion.
You are correct though, science indicates we have had numerous past warming trends, but they occur over thousands of years. It is the speed at which this is occurring that is alarming.
Of course we do not have much of a discussion...because people of "science" believe themselves above everyone else...in the grand scheme of things, there are a handful of people who call themselves scientists...they firmly believe their word is more important than any other piece of information available to man...and yet, how many hundreds of "proven science theories" have been changed throughout the history of man...flat earth/round earth...hell, they can't even prove gravity, other than to say it exists but they have no clue how...every single time they "learn" something new, it changes a "fact" they established in the past...science itself is the single biggest science denier!
No, it is not their word. It is the scientific process.
Thanks for the comment anyway.
Whether it is their word, or their "scientific process" matters not...if it alters the "facts" that were established by previous "scientific processes," then the entire system is faulty. In order for something to be proven factual, it must stand the test of time...which much of science does not.
But obviously you are ill equipped for such a debate, so I will bid you farewell. Thanks for the opportunity to comment...have a great holiday!
Dude they are not facts. They are theories and they are better than anything else anyone has to offer because they are testable. Please read the diagram below three or four times please. This is my last comment on this thread. Happy holidays to you too.
You continue to find new names for the faulty information you want others to blindly accept right along with you..."theories" or "facts", they continue to be debunked by future "theories" and "facts."
...and your continued refusal to actually engage in debate, leads one to assume you do not fully believe the "science" stuff yourself...which actually amounts to hypocrisy...but what do I know, I'm not an intelligent "science" supporter!
Happy Holidays!!!
Sigh. I know I said I was done commenting, but the flaws you describe are part of the process! Please read the above diagram a few more times.
If the "process" has "flaws," then the "results" are "faulty!" Thank-you for finally seeing the light!
Well this road leads to nowhere so I'm taking the exit. I will enjoy reading your final comment though. Thanks and happy holidays.
Of course it leads to nowhere...you are incapable of debate...either we all accept your "flawed" processes as scientific "proof" of errant theories, or we are not worthy of being spoken to...how do you people breathe with your heads jammed so far up there?
I find it very interesting that those who go around spouting nonsense like "the science is settled" are completely unaware that the large majority of scientists conducting research in this area are, in one way or another, funded by government money. Whether through university grants or via employment directly by said government. So, if said government wants to push a particular agenda (like global warming) and the scientist finds results that don't follow the agenda, guess which scientist does not get funded again. Why do we distrust the government in almost every other way (weapons of mass distruction / economy / etc...) but give them 100% trust when it comes the environment? I am a climate change believer...I know that the climate changes...it has been changing since our planet was a ball of gas. To be so naive as to think that arresting climate change would be anything other than catastrophic for our planet is beyond arrogant. Arresting those changes would surely cause the death of the Earth.
Yes I agree
So maybe it all comes down to whether or not you believe governments and ngo's worldwide are pulling a fast one on us.
I'll stick with the more logical conclusion that climate change is real.
"The more logical conclusion," this just keeps getting better and better...so, now the rest of the "non-believing" world is illogical at best...nothing like bathing in hypocrisy, eh?
Of course climate change is real...I'm not disputing that...try to keep up...
Actually we have analyzed temperatures for tens and even hundreds of thousands of years through secondary analysis. Your closemindedness to science and iterative discovery is part of the problem that people face. It's hard to deal with these issues when a good portion of the population refuses to deal with logic and reason. The problem is not non-existent, it's large and right in front of you. You are just refusing to see it.
Logic and reason...your acceptance of "flawed" processes to "prove" theories is the closemindedness that creates problems...you holier than thou types cannot handle other people having different opinions...your so stuck on your delusions, you will spare no expense to be the epitome of hypocrisy that permeates today's society...BRAVO SHEEPLE...continue to be led around by the nose, rather than do any real thinking for yourself!
I accept only factual processes. I can't help if you struggle to comprehend correct science and travel down any path where there is some sort of overarching government conspiracy. There are plenty of things where people's opinions matter, science is all about facts. My opinions don't matter either, only facts and reality. No I don't recognize opinions on science, because I am a scientist and know what science IS.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...you literally just proved my point...I forgot that scientists and Liberals were almost identical twins from the hypocrisy hymen!
Good luck.