You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Space Is Not Expanding and Why!
Your theory is a much more sensible interpretation. Also, another wrong conclusion caused by the false "expanding universe" interpretation is that "The expansion of the universe causes distant galaxies to recede from us faster than the speed of light" [wikipedia]. Indeed, if redshift was caused by the galaxies' motion (doppler effect), not only we conclude in an earth-centric accelerating universe, but also the very distant galaxies seem to go faster than the speed of light! Don't you think that this is another good reason to reject the "expanding universe" theory?
Hi thanks again! There are definitely countless reasons to reject the expanding universe theory. Their solution to this faster than the speed of light problem was to say they aren't moving faster than the speed of light but that space is physically expanding, removing a large enough chunk of the redshift (Hubble's law) and assigning it to the result of this expansion, so as to maintain the theory. Then, the galaxies are interpreted to be only moving at a certain velocity below the speed of light and, voila, all is well as space is clearly expanding. Besides the whole distribution of an utterly false, completely untrue fundamental description of reality being presented as essentially true when the only thing true about it are the observations upon which it is built. Those aren't really focused on though, and mostly we just learn the interpretations which are, simply put, wrong every step of the way.