You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Risks of Unrestricted Science Publication and Endangered Species

in #science7 years ago (edited)

I 100% agree; scientific data should be completely available to the public. Transparency is just an all around a good practice, but more importantly, conservation efforts rely on collaborative range maps (I am a coordinator for FrogWatch USA and I contribute to these range maps). But that does beg the question: how do we make sure this information isn't used irresponsibly? An entire species could be wiped out because of what information is made available; how do we make sure that doesn't happen?

Sort:  

how do we make sure this information isn't used irresponsibly? An entire species could be wiped out because of what information is made available; how do we make sure that doesn't happen?

These are great questions, and unfortunately I don't have any good answers for them.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.18
JST 0.031
BTC 86390.02
ETH 3257.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.93