You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: One change to make science more open?
Publishing in a high impact journal is not, in and of itself, a contribution to science at all. Studies should not be judged by the journal which published them, but rather a verifiable record (beyond just citations) that the outputs of that study are driving the next generation of research.
Exactly.
Some journals also suck, in terms of the editorial team (regardless their impact factor):)
I couldn't imagine what the Nature of this comment could be.
I don't like Nature. A good journal, but a shitty non-open-access policy :)