One of the false axioms I see happening all the time is the idea that your integers don't have to be a measurement in reality. So when they apply the inverse square law to the dissipation of light they always assume the distance of the sun. Essentially this is imagination and not a measurement. Thus what looks like math isn't because the numbers are not measurements. If you have a foot which is 12 inches, but sometimes it changes to 11 inches well no mathematical operations can be done when the measurement is not a constant. Dividing a foot by 2 is only 6 inches if the integer is 12 inches. If statements applied in math proves it is not math. LOL
P.S masoncerritos will be voting for your next post. Do not bother following.
Man I was just fighting with something similar. I was looking at the sun distances and doing a little research. I came across the fact that Au had changed. I always just thought it was this fractal of “light speed.” It used to deal with suns mass and complex factors. I just find it crazy that people have thrown actual test away, for mathematics. It bothers me they cant understand math can never be used in lieu of the scientific method to come to some of these conclusions they do. Math is a formal science, not a substitute for test. And you mention false axioms, so much of this theoretical science we have now is based literally off complete assumption. A quick example, would be if the Cassini probe never went 750 million miles away to Saturn, that was about 4,000 offical white papers, that were misconstrued as absolute fact into academia. You see how quickly this can ugly real fast. Thanks for the reply.
I do see how ugly it gets all the time in real BS research. I don't know if you know how the fraud is getting into science so I will share what I think. Ever wonder how the Big Bang Theory was named. It was specifically given the name theory because they knew people would question it if they called it the Big Bang Hypothesis and that the confusion would help them make converts. It has worked so well they have continued the practice. See the Theory of Evolution Hypothesis. They just forget to categorize their ideas properly and people join the religion of scientism.
P.S Up voting your own post is really just more curation value and I don't think people should mistake up votes for likes. I also up vote comments because it ads more curation value to the post. Authors should up vote commenters on their post for the same reason, even if they don't like the commenters comment. It is all about raising the value of steem in the end. LOL