You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What is light ? (Atomic Physics Video Series – Part 2)
Trying to explain light without understanding and explaining the aether is a futile task. As a result, the current "scientific" explanation of light doesn't do a very good job of explaining the phenomena we see light do.
Like, the double slit experiment. Where, a single photon will go through both slits and interfere with itself. Or, if there is an observer, (at any time, past or future) the photon will only go through one slit.
Nonsense as usual I see.
Yep, materialistic science is nonsense. It has been disproven way too many times, but it it is still staunchly supported by all those college professors.
No, what you are talking about is nonsense. As is always the case, I havent seen you respond with anything resembling a coherent logic based comment in the year or so I've seen you rambling about.
I realize this comment is ad hominem, but it doesn't much matter. You are going around talking about aether. And insulting actual physicists and professors. Complete hog wash.
If what you consider "logic" is that it came from a science book, then you are correct.
In order to understand physics (electrical - magnetics) I have had to throw away all I have learned. To throw out the entire science book used in today's college courses.
What I am saying is more correct than what is "common scientific knowledge", but it won't become apparent for probably a generation.
So, to you, I will always sound like a lunatic.
Here is an example that you should know very well:
Nikola Tesla was in a college class and talked about making an AC motor. The professor said it couldn't be done, and took all that day to explain to the class why it "scientifically" couldn't be done.
Fortunately, Tesla didn't take that to heart, and kept working on creating an AC motor. The results is our modern world.
What I am doing is no less painful.
Lol, Tesla you are not.