Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear power plants provide power to millions of people, but many people don’t actually know how they function.
Power Through Fission
Nuclear power plants, like most sources of power, boil water and use that to turn a turbine. The only difference is where the energy to boil this water comes from. In nuclear reactors this energy comes from fission.
The Containment Structure
The main purpose of the containment structure is to keep the reactor stable and to reduce the amount of escaping radiation. These are generally made of metal or concrete, often over a meter thick.
The Reactor
The reactor holds another concrete dome filled with water. This water is heats up and is piped out to the turbines.
Nuclear Fuel
The Fuel is U-235 and/or Pu- 239. The fuel usually comes in small pellets. These pellets are put into metal rods to form a fuel rod. These rods are put into a fuel assembly so that they can be inserted into the nuclear reactor
The Assembly
There are about 160 fuel assemblies per nuclear reactor. They are 4-5 meters tall and about 20 cm across.
These assemblies must be made so that the fission can not go critical.
The Control Rods
Control rods are made out of a metal that absorbs neutrons. These rods are inserted between the stacks of nuclear fuel to control the rate of fission. They are most often made out of silver, indium or cadmium.
Types of Nuclear Reactors
There are six main types of nuclear reactors each with slightly different uses.
Most reactors use water as a coolant. There are two types of water: heavy water and light water. Heavy water has hydrogen with one neutron and light water has hydrogen with only a proton. Heavy water has an atomic mass of twenty while light water has an atomic mass of eighteen. This makes heavy water less volatile and capable of holding more energy.
Most reactors use low-enriched uranium. Natural uranium is mostly uranium 238, which can not sustain a nuclear reaction. Uranium 235, which can sustain a nuclear reaction, makes up about 0.7% of natural uranium. Low-enriched uranium contains between 0.7% and 20% uranium 235.
Reactors use moderators to slow down neutrons. Slow neutrons are more likely to cause fission. Water works well as both a coolant and a moderator so it is the one used most often.
Boiling Water Reactor
Boiling water reactors are most used in the United States, Japan, and Sweden. This reactor boils light water using low-enriched uranium. This water goes through a closed loop and pushes a turbine. The water next comes in contact with another loop to cool and condense the steam and it then re-enters the reactor.
Pressurized Water Reactor
Pressurized water reactors are by far the most common and are used in the United States, France, Japan, Russia, and China. This reactor uses two loops of light water. The first loop is highly pressurized and goes through the reactor core. This loop then comes in contact with another unpressurized loop and boils the water in that loop. That water in the second loop powers a turbine.
Heavy Water Reactor
Heavy water reactors are really only used in Canada and India. Instead of light water this reactor uses heavy water. It functions the same as a pressurized water reactor but uses heavy water instead of light water. The properties of heavy water allows it to use natural uranium. This saves the cost of enriching the uranium but adds in the cost of finding or creating heavy water.
source
Graphite Moderated Reactor
This reactor is the most dangerous type and is being fazed out. Graphite is kept in the reactor core with a mix of helium and nitrogen to cool the reactor and transfer the heat. Then either carbon, helium, or light water power a turbine. These are usually built without safety features, the Chernobyl plant was this type. This type only uses slightly-enriched uranium.
Fast Breeder Reactor
Fast breeder reactors have a different goal. They use a moderator that doesn’t slow down neutrons. This causes the uranium 238 to turn into uranium 239 and then decay into plutonium. This plutonium can be harvested for nuclear weapons. These are primarily used in the United States. Laws about the usage of radioactive material have made it hard to extract the plutonium so these reactors are not used often.
We can’t keep using coal and oil forever, we must switch to renewable sources. There is about 4.5 billion tons of uranium in seawater alone, enough to supply all our current nuclear reactors for 6500 years.
But the problem is where they throw the nuclear waste?
well that plays into my next post lol we usually put it into old mines and stuff last I checked but we can use it in a liquid salt reactor and save a lot of time and money
There are lot of other sources if those could be funded our earth will be out of this pollution. Those could be Solar energy, wind energy, perpetual motion, gravitational energy etc .
perpetual motion?
I have copied link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
It is the angle of position if you set two objects it stay continue in motion
Perpetual motion is impossible though it violates thermodynamics
Good post. It's heartbreaking when people opposes nuclear power just because ignorance and/or ideology.
Why is it heartbreaking if different people are of different opinions?
I also oppose it because the reactors produce huge amounts of nuclear waste. The following generations will have to deal with that (and lets hope they then will still know where all our waste is stored ...).
I have nothing against your different opinion though. As always there are pros and cons.
And the article is well written so that I upvoted it. :)
just shoot it into space tbh
Hm ... isn't it just a matter of statistics when the first waste loaded rocket would explode within our atmosphere? And we would need a lot of them.
http://seaborg.co/wasteburner/
I agree there are interesting ideas.
But also "The Seaborg Wasteburner" is still in research phase. I am curious to learn more about it (of course also about possible risks).
You may write an article one day ...
by the time it becomes a problem we could easily have enough of them and liquid salt reactors can use spent nuclear fuel
But: do we use liquid salt reactors already now in practice? :-)
We will see what future brings. If you are right, and in practice a really save method to reuse nuclear waste again (without producing further dangerous fallout) establishes in future, then of course I will congratulate you.
Until then I stay on the skeptical side, my friend. :)
also liquid salt reactors
nice post friend
thank
You ever meet a Boilermaker?
no I haven't
Pleased to meet you. ✌️
o