Cones and Pyramids as Ambiently Powered Energy Manipulators by E.D. O'Brian

One complication with the field of emerging technology, destined to be the basis of tomorrow's science, is that it is too big. It has so many facets that every once in a while, worthwhile concepts get forgotten as diverse new matters continuously attract our attention. Pyramids and cones illustrate this point. Both they and other structures "process", control, or otherwise manipulate at least one form of ambient energy without the use of any other energy input. As a group, all of such items may be referred to as ambiently powered energy manipulators (APEMs)

This article is intended to discuss the current state of knowledge relative to these devices. To avoid confusion between such structures and those which do not have any significant or material influence upon any ambient energy, any subsequent reference to either pyramids or cones in this discussion is intended to designate energy-affecting pyramids and cones unless a contrary meaning is clearly intended. The latter may be referred to as "APEM type" structures.

Pyramids, as are significant in connection with tomorrow's science, are still "in", that is in the sense that there is a substantial amount of current references to them, even though they seem to have lost some of their attention-getting ability. On the contrary, cones seem to be gradually slipping into the forgotten past. Stein's justifiably popular book Mind Machines You Cap Build (1992 G. Harry Stein, Top of the Mountain Publishing) illustrates this point. It has an entire chapter based on pyramids, and also references the pioneering work of Dr. Flanagan in this field, but it says nary a word about those closely related structures - cones.

Current knowledge about cones is very different than the present information about pyramids. The energy-affecting cones of recent interest undoubtedly have an unrecognized precedent in some structure or structures of ancient history and are capable of being compared with the pyramids of Egypt No one seems concerned that this is probably the case. As a practical matter, current knowledge and recent past interest in cones appears to be almost entirely based on the work of a famous dowser, a Mr. Verne Cameron.

The restricted amount known to the general public relative to his activity with these structures is almost completely limited to the information reported in a series of periodicals entitled "The Pyramid Guide". Fifty five issues of this publication were published from Sept. 1972 to September- October 1981 by various entities starting with an associate of Mr. Cameron, Mr. Bill Cox. To a very limited extent, the information gleaned from these publications, along with a supplemental discussion of Mr. Cameron's work with cones, appears in the booklet The Cameron Aurameter published by Borderlands. Mr. Cameron died in 1974, prior to the issuance of these publications.

To put it mildly, both of these sources of information have serious limitations. They clearly omit much which one would anticipate that they might contain. Although The Pyramid Guide is saturated with materials pertaining to pyramids which affect energy, in going over all of the issues of it, the writer has been unable to find a single reference to Dr. Flanagan. Neither does it contain many other bits of reasonably common information concerning present knowledge of pyramids. When this is considered ·in connection with the relatively limited and apparently incomplete discussions of cones found in this publication, a person cannot help but wonder if there is information about cones which was known to Mr. Cameron (and probably others) which is now lost.

Both energy-affecting pyramids and cones are significant because they act as "concentrators" of one or more not yet identified forms of radiation. For convenience of reference, the energy or energies affected by these devices are subsequently referred to as a single form of energy even though there is a reasonable chance that this may be in error. These cones and pyramids do not originate any such energy; they merely "gather" it and either hold it, accumulate it, or send it on its way. This is usually as a beam or column in either the original or a modified form.

As a result of this, it is clear that both types of structures can be used as internal chambers containing concentrated energy or as sources of relatively concentrated accumulations or beams of radiated energy. In both cases, the energy may or may not be used to accomplish a recognizable result in accordance with the characteristics of what or who is contacted by the energy, the manner in which the energy is applied, and the nature of the specific form of energy present at the time something is contacted with it.

The range of utilities attributed to the energy associated with both pyramids and cones is too extensive to be discussed in detail in an article of moderate length. The list is so extensive, it is almost hard to believe. While cones have been used for less reasons than pyramids, it is normally considered that anything which can be treated in one of them can also be similarly treated in the other. These APEM devices have been used for such diverse purposes as sharpening razor blades, inducing mental reactions, preserving animate bodies and foods, upgrading cheap whiskey and tobacco, and affecting the growth and longevity of both plants and lower life forms such as bacteria and fungi. No references have been located in preparing this discussion which fairly or reasonably suggest that they may be considered as medical devices.

In general, most of the accomplishments reported as being achieved with either pyramids or cones are what those believing in only traditional science would either: (1) classify as belonging in the realm of science fiction instead of the real world; or (2) ignore because they do not "fit" within currently accepted technology. All too often, believers in non-traditional science, on the basis of their enthusiasm, grasp onto beneficial results that may not exist, while non-believers reject unquestionable results on the basis that they have, and will continue to, reject all that is associated with the occult.

Up to the present, the benefits associated with energy-affecting cones and pyramids have not been universally acknowledged. This is because of a lack of a simple, objective manner of measuring either the energy present at a specific time and location, or what in fact happens whenever one of these devices is used. Although instances such as the sharpness of a razor blade having been treated in a pyramid can accurately be determined with current, generally accepted techniques, such items are either relatively difficult to measure or do not seem to be otherwise satisfactory to gauge the energy or energies affiliated with cones and pyramids. As a consequence, there is often a lack of adequate, incontrovertible information as is needed to expand the closed minds of society that have been created by religion and established technology.

Some will object to this last conclusion. In so doing, they can be expected to correctly indicate that Mr. Cameron used a psychograph of his invention - the so called Cameron Aurarneter - to locate energies associated with cones and other items. Unfortunately, information obtained by dowsing and other psychographic techniques is not yet regarded as being incontrovertible, even by those with knowledge in various branches of occult phenomena.

It is to be anticipated that in time, reliable, easily used methods of indicating the relative strength of the energy associated with a specific APEM will be developed or recognized. At present, it is considered that devices that are moved by mental energy in psychokenesis will most likely be · the initial structures used in determining the relative strengths of those energies associated with pyramids and cones that are used for different purposes.

Although it is inherent that all energy can be used either beneficially or detrimentally, the literature relative to energy affecting pyramids and cones significantly avoids discussing material that has produced detrimental results. This seems wrong. Care should always be taken when trying an unknown energy for a new purpose, as to make sure that there are no significantly undesired results. The latter statement applies regardless of whether a cone or a pyramid is used to provide energy to something within the structure itself, or when directing a column or beam toward something located externally of the structure. As used in this sentence, "thing" designates humans as well as other living and
non-living items.

When it is necessary to use a container to hold something to be treated, either in a cone or pyramid or by a beam of energy from either of these, the container should be at least partially transparent to whatever energy or energies which may be present. Currently, such transparency is best determined on an empirical basis. As a matter of routine, it is considered best to avoid using imperforate containers formed of common metals, certain types of glass (particularly lead crystal glass), and materials known to be impermeable to common microwaves.

Most individuals will consider that it is self-evident that a beam or column of energy from a pyramid or cone, employed so as to apply a beam or column .of energy to whatever is being treated, should be located where the beam will engage it. Under normal circumstances, this will be along the axis of the device. This can be at either extremity of the cone or pyramid or within the structure itself. Complications can arise in connection with this when efforts are made to direct the radiation by either reflecting it, confining it, or having it moved along a conductor.

It seems to be uniformly agreed that whatever is being exposed to the collection or accumulation of energy within a pyramid or cone should be located along or reasonably near the axis of the device about a third of the way from the bottom of the structure in order to achieve as much benefit from the energy "processed" within such a structure as is reasonably possible. This view is apparently based on both simple geometry and experience.

Many other devices or structures do the same or nearly the same thing as cones and pyramids. They also operate in about the same manner in which pyramids and cones operate. These include a series of three-dimensional structures of various types, as well as many two-dimensional representations of unmodified pyramids, cones, spirals and other structures. Also included are nonstructural symbols and other representations. As a group, the latter demonstrate the concept in magic in which a symbol is a surrogate for whatever it represents.

Some apparently take the view that all things associated with pyramids, cones, and their equivalents are bad because in a sense, all of them involve the unknown, the occult, or other various forms of magic. This is nonsense. All energy-affecting pyramids, cones, and two and three-dimensional structures (as well as representations which are related to one of them) operate using mechanisms which are "obscure" to currently accepted technology. Fortunately, it is not necessary to understand how all of these things "operate," as they are used in order to produce beneficial results.

A discussion as to the employment of pyramids can be easily extended to a detailed consideration of the historical pyramids in Egypt There is no point in encumbering this document with a mass of insignificant material relating to these historical marvels. Common belief largely based on this material currently holds that a "modern" four sided pyramid normally is useful only when: (1) it has the relative proportions of the Great Pyramid in Egypt; (2) its axis is vertical; and (3) two of its sides are aligned toward true north. The first of these "requirements" is significant in that it relates the manner in which it is preferable to construct both cones and pyramids.

Stein's text, along with many other materials, indicate that when a four sided pyramid is "properly" proportioned in a traditional manner, the angles between its opposed sides and its bottom are as indicated in the accompanying Fig. 1. This Fig.1 is a side elevational view of a hollow pyramid [designated as Fig. 1.]; Fig. 2 is a top plan view of this same pyramid; and Fig. 3 is a cross sectional view of it taken at line 3-3 of Fig. 1. It is noted that a sectional view taken at line 1-1 in Fig. 2 will correspond to Fig. 1. It will alao be apparent that another sectional view appearing as Fig.3 could be taken along a line passing through the undesignated diagonal in Fig. 2.

From these views, it will be obvious that in a pyramid proportioned in a classic manner, both the interior and exterior angles between the sides and the side edges as shown in Figs. 1 and 3 are 77.43 degrees and 97.16 degrees, respectively. This results in the angle between the axis of the pyramid and the sides and side edges of the pyramid when a plane is passed through the axis of the pyramid and then rotated varying so as to be both above and below 90 degrees. According to The Pyramid Guide& it appears to be important for the internal angle in a plane passing through the axis of the cone to be 90 degrees as shown in Fig. 4. Apparently neither this statement relative to cones nor the beliefs as to the criticality of pyramid proportions is to be taken as incontrovertible gospel.

Read the rest of the article here: https://www.aether-force.com/cones-and-pyramids-as-ambiently-powered-energy-manipulators-by-e-d-obrian/

This article was sourced from Journal of Borderland Research Vol LI No 4 Fourth Quarter 1995

Download the full volume here: http://bit.ly/2lM0ZbH

A collection of Journal of Borderlands Research Volumes can be downloaded here: http://bit.ly/2L5cGWo