Food and Well, in any case, they are not

"
ood and Well, in any case, they are not that adequate such constructivist models are they are less controversial In a sense Yes, since they are limited to exist within ours. You, when in this sense there are less chances to run into a contradiction and there is no need to go beyond our own consciousness in general By the way this is one of the biggest features of one of the biggest mysteries Consciousness is how our consciousness makes an exit its own limit is in fact the greatest mystery Welcome dravstvuyte Now we talk about forms of knowledge. Cognition as we have already found out for this kind of activity and activity the form of the subject's activity directed is complemented The external world form or asset is historically culturally somehow conditioned up to a certain time-dependent epoch in which it occurs ie that is the kind of activity that can be correlated with this conditional subjective object Yes the person the object and the Arrow between them is good to remember but not that the circuit does not show does not show all the diverse already there is to continue what kind of this here is this topic at the clarification of the main mother should say the following regardless of the era in which we exist, regardless of the time since the very birth of the philosophy of almost spontaneous generation, we can observe certain historical and philosophical Kalishche can see you are such a clip where you miss somewhere trying to synthesize two approaches on the issue about the nature of the cognition of the I and the moment these two possible ways are this sensual one of the side irrational as far as I remember already here is this here this is the opposition we can find in antiquity A m We can find it in the mind of the source question late. Where do we get the knowledge? Where to head this juice