RE: SBD Potato Day 51: Potato Police!
We could name a 100 things that we would want different but in the end we have to deal with what we have now and what we have now is 6-7 potato/burnpost trending posts.
You could claim those posts have value since people are voting them but there is no escaping that they are shitposts and whenever someone comes here they see those shitposts.
People that agree with my stance are in the overwhelming majority in numbers yet in minority stake. (Dig through the posts on this topic)
Stake does trump numbers here which is why everyone is trying to appeal to common sense of those running these projects.
This isnt a good look for Steem and another thing to consider is the creators that see towards what the rewards are going. This isnt encouraging anyone to remain here but rather killing motivation.
Im not saying we should be bound by what others feel and think but if youre a big stake holder you probably should consider it and weigh the pros vs cons when doing burnpost/sbdpotato type projects.
There was this dapp on Steem that was like quora. They had placeholder posts for their comments.
Why not stop making these Burnpost posts and simply vote comments, 10 of them a day at lower values?
Based on what? Speed of production?
The experiment is of interest to me and that’s why I vote the posts.
I for one would (and do) forget to vote these comments, and at present, these comments also appear in Trending.
Based on repetition of the same post content where 3-4 of the exact same post takes up trending spots. Based on low effort of the presented content. Based on justifiable assumptions of what those coming to steem will think seeing sbdpotato and burnpost taking the majority of the trending spots.
Comments wont appear if you spread the votes over multiple comments.
Use steemvoter if you cant remember to vote comments.
This could work if the number of comment are high (say 20 or 30 per day), and people spread out their votes on the lower value comments, but that's a bit of a leap, since you can't control where people vote.
Low effort is kind of irrelevant since the reward is zero. The ratio of effort to reward is more favorable than any other post in fact.
Now if other people want to make higher effort, higher quality posts and also burn a serious chunk of their rewards (maybe not 100%, but also not the token 3% that I sometimes see), they would probably get more votes than burnpost (since, yes, by intent and in fact burnposts do suck on matter of content), and this problem would be solved.
Despite being the creator of burnpost, I routinely direct my own vote power to other posts that burn and also have other value instead of to burnpost (which only burns and has no other value), so this is not entirely theoretical. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.
hey man, since you have an interest on this experiment, how about we start discussing with actual facts and knowledge, and not "guessing" if this could work or not.
Feel free to read what i wrote about the basic economic reason why this won't work:
https://steempeak.com/sbdpotato/@phgnomo/law-of-supply-and-demand-definition-and-explanation-or-why-the-sbdpotato-experiment-just-won-t-work
There is also a lot of other negative implications (besides trending pollution) than can come from this, and i am just doing a bit more research about it before writing about it.
Burnpost comments have about the same value as the posts usually (not always, sometimes they are somewhat lower), and comments still show up on trending.
I mean, make more of them. VP is limited, comments (realistically) arent.
Yeah I said the same thing elsewhere. 20-30 comments per day could help. But people may still pile on to the higher ones. I'll consider trying it though.