You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: This Proposal Is An Attack On SBD... Sound The Alarm!
The post points out that "it must be created and distributed widely across the platform" [emphasis in original]
The proposal threatens that, to the extent that alternate interfaces are not widely enough used, which is at this point extremely uncertain (no widely used alternate interfaces exist at all).
I don't disagree with that at all. I was just pointing out a technicality in wording. The post said that the proposal would cause "no new SBD would be produced aside from interest payments on existing balances". This is technically not correct, at least based on what is being discussed in the specific GitHub issue that is being referred to.