Sort:  

Pretty sure Sargon's not a intentionally pushing any "Deep state agenda".

However, there clearly comes a point where governments cannot be reformed from non-violent means, and I'm not sure if he acknowledges this obvious fact.

It is certainly possible, that just as am I, he is merely human, and as such cannot be held to some divine standard of lucidity.

The anger that impelled my consideration at the time of my post may have contributed to my disavowal, yet I do not find my conclusions as to the viability of an utterly corrupt mechanism at all short of certainty.

Perhaps my own certainty does fail to recognize the possibility that others have yet to attain it, and assigning to malicious intent what may simply be honest disagreement was short-sighted.

Even so, I will have to consider the evidence my own eyes have seen, and test the judgements and proposals of Sargon and others thereby.

Thanks for pointing out my need to recognize my own bias towards the truth I know, and that I do need to consider my fallibility when judging that of others.

I find that the truth is often too grim for some people to actually even perceive it, which causes them to dismiss it out of hand, and therefore you as either a cynic or a nutjob.

We must be very careful, diplomatic, and persistent to get through to these people.

Sargon released a video on the reality of child-trafficking rings in response to his unwillingness to address Pizzagate for one simple reason he reveals in the video: "there is no proof".

That's all beside the point, his main point is those that refuse to believe that certain awful things can or do happen, particularly in spite of established fact and public record, provide literal cover to those that do these things, make it easier to do these things, and therefore more +EV and game theoretically correct (from their sick perspective) to do so.

It's a disturbing view, but I will paste it below:

Loading...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.18
JST 0.031
BTC 87323.66
ETH 3162.70
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.83