Not bad, the interviewer...

he wants to believe, but not locking himself in his beliefs, contrary to RT and the rMFA.

the locking it's terrible, then reality evolve, and until the next locking, that's what terrible there is the transitions, ruin credibility, ruin durability, ruin trust, make the whole enemy as a threat, part of the threat structure, as it reduces the understanding of reality. skewing a framework.

if you aren't in reality, where are you but in the fiction of a "grand strategy", ruin incoming.

the world isn't a chess board, the fundamental error, nor a Go board (for those with more IQ than the pathetic 64 locations), no it's dynamic and there is always something to learn, as things move, by themselves, like continent... woohhooo.

illusion of a lockin exemple? the other in artymosk, they locked themselves in narrative, and until they are devastated, then they relock in another, the grasshopering. lead to nowhere.