Russia in US politics: Truths and Lies!
Remember, remember! The fifth of November, The Gunpowder treason and plot; I know of no reason Why the Gunpowder treason Should ever be forgot!
People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people!
GREETINGS, PEOPLE OF THE WORLD - WE ARE ANONYMOUS. The banking-military-industrial-complexes of the world keep pushing to divide The People. They put blames on certain groups, and keep us divided, ignoring them who are the true threats. No one group is more a threat than any others. Humanity, as a whole, has done great harm to other humans. When one group is cast with blame, we shall show the other side of such stories...these are the sides that the corporate media don't want you to think of. Just follow the bouncing ball, sit back, and don't question.
Some of us will no longer do so.
The liberal leaning media is still on about Russia, as it seems desperate, or maybe, hell-bent, on getting Trump out of office. Maybe, if they can't do it that way, they will try Madonna's method?
Perhaps one of the biggest lies: The election itself wasn’t actually hacked. No one hacked the election, or otherwise changed votes. Russians were responsible for the leaked emails from the DNC and from Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton’s camp. The very emails that confirmed that they rigged their choice for Clinton over Sanders, thus not caring what The People wanted. No federal agency has stated that these were fake. But let's just say that Russia hacked the election, instead of admitting that the Clinton party very much is the Clinton Party, based on this.
All the claims that Russia helped Trump win show how retarded people are. This would imply that the emails somehow changed people's minds on who to vote for. If anything, it should have encouraged Sanders supporters to vote for an independent or 3rd party Candidate. Perhaps The Green Party?
The Obama admin suffered many, and far worse, cyber attacks. Where was the public outcry over them? Wouldn't they be hacking and influencing the Obama admin, using the prior "Russia hacking to give Trump the 2016 election?"
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/media-russian-hacks/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=rightalertsemail&utm_content=2017-01-04&utm_campaign=can?utm_source=email&utm_medium=rightalertsemail&utm_content=2017-01-04&utm_campaign=can
The Washington Post reported that the Obama administration had known about Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election since that summer, while confirming that hacking efforts had no impact on the vote counts. Isn't it amazing how Trump-haters seem to skip over that. They want to place all blame on Trump, yet it was known at least during the summer, by the current admin, Obama's that Russia was making efforts to influence the election. Imagine that.
Overall, the intelligence community confirms that while there were different results of the attacks, no results had been changed. Maybe, like North Dakota, the U S should go to paper ballots, so thus, harder to hack paper.
With all the rest of the skewed Russia witch hunt, one has to ask, why is there one in the first place?
Both in the past, and recently, with the US doing strikes against Syria, Syria has gone to Russia, and together, they have gone to the UN, condemning the attacks as acts of aggression by the US. We the People told Obama No War in Syria. Some even told Obama that war had to go through Congress. Obama tried to ask Congress for war, and We The People told our members of Congress to tell him no! Somehow, magically, ISIS suddenly became a threat, and Obama felt justified in his surgical strikes.
However, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirmed their usage, at a time and location that diplomatic sources stated the chemical had been used in the clashes between Islamic State and another rebel group. Not Assad and the Syiran government, but rebels and I S. Despite this, and many other facts, Obama decided to blame Assad.
In September and November of 2015, the FBI reached out to the DNC, warning that information from them was being transmitted to Russia.
March of 2016, John Podesta, Clinton campaign chairman, was the victim of phising, which let hackers have access to his email.
In July, hacked emails from the DNC show that DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz insults members of Sanders' campaign, and appear to support Clinton, instead of being neutral; Debbie resigns. Also, the FBI begins to investigate the DNC hack, not a general election hack.
In September, Vladmir states that the content of the leaks—such as the DNC favoring Clinton over Sanders—is more important than who did the hack. Despite the focus being on the DNC, rank members of the DNC decide to state that it's an attack on the election itself, ignoring that the leaks reveal their bias against Sanders.
In December, the FBI has yet to find proof that the attacks were to help Trump.
In January 2017, According to the report, hackers did not breach voting machines or computers that tallied election results.
In March, Trump ally Roger Stone, according to a New York Times interview, stated he communicated with Guccifer 2.0 after the DNC hack, proving no collusion with Trump for a cyber attack.
So, while there were numerous ATTEMPTS to hack the election, at no point did Russians actually tamper with, or in any way alter election data. At best, they attempted to breach the systems. At worst, they got voter related data.
So, not quite the “Russia hacked the election” truth-skewers want you to believe. In addition, there is no evidence that they actually influenced the election results, one way or the other. They attempted, and in some cases, successfully breached election systems that were not up to encrypted standards, but no votes were changed, or otherwise altered, to give Trump the election.
We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not Forgive. We do not Forget. EXPECT us!