Well worth listening to. It amazes me that no serious historian or chemist has taken the trouble to challenge Germar, Irving etc. with original research. At the very least, there should be the possibility of a scientific debate resting on authentic historical documents, accurate demographic data and physical analyses of the premises, instead of opinions, defamation and threats.
Well worth listening to. It amazes me that no serious historian or chemist has taken the trouble to challenge Germar, Irving etc. with original research. At the very least, there should be the possibility of a scientific debate resting on authentic historical documents, accurate demographic data and physical analyses of the premises, instead of opinions, defamation and threats.