You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: I am Highly Disappointed with the Crypto Currency World and the Rise of the Banker Coin Ripple.
I will add, that I don't think that Ripple will survive in the long run. The market knows better and it will die at one point.
There are many shit coins atm at the coinmarketcap list... in my view the best coins are:
Bitcoin
Steem
Bts
Golos
and from next week EOS!
There are many amazing teams.
Thats what I thought would happen, but believe me, the masses act on impulses. The ripple will have much broader recognition than bitcoin. Because they will have the mass medias' backing.
Or maybe it's because ripple has better tech and the value the system creates goes to someone other than electric companies and ASIC manufacturers. Oh, and also because three companies in China don't get paid millions to choose which transactions go in each block.
I always admired your talent and work, you should be defending liberty and peace, not helping banking tools. We all know now that the bankers are the problem not electricity or asics. Nothing personal...
You are missing the point. That's what I am doing. I'm like the guy getting the government to build the Internet, offering the people with money and power a solution to a very real problem they have while building a completely open system underneath that is inherently liberating.
I'm getting the banks to build a system to move money around the world that they cannot control.
If you're ever in the San Francisco area, let's have lunch. This is not an easy question to answer in a public forum.
Thanks for the invitation, same here, if you are ever in Istanbul (Turkey) area, let me buy you a shish-kebab and baklava.
Yum. That sounds awesome. Okay, I think I'll have to raise my offer. I used to smoke rib competitively. Come to Oakland and I'll make a giant pile of smoked ribs.
I've actually always wanted to go to Istanbul. I got close one time, I was on a train that would have continued to Istanbul but my stop was a bit earlier.
Is that why you chose the banks first? You are distriburing the stones to people and building the highway for the banks.
There were a lot of reasons, but I think the core reason was this: If we want a world where people use crypto-currencies for everything, we need a way to get from here to there. The shortest path to that bridge seemed to be to convince banks to hook up to public ledger that could handle arbitrary assets, including bitcoin. There were many easier paths we could have chosen if we just wanted to launch an alt coin -- remember, we were pursuing FIs when they wanted nothing to do with this entire space. But we felt it was the fastest way to get huge growth. To use the same analogy again, the Internet grew to the point where it could host everyone's blog because it got the government and the big information providers onboard.
Bitcoin maximalists who care only about the price of bitcoin are lying about us. They have put their personal stake in the price of bitcoin above the principles bitcoin was founded on. The system Ripple is building will be good for bitcoin too. We're building a level playing field for using assets to bridge large financial transactions.
Let me ask you a question: Is your idea of liberty a system where everybody has to use the same system with the same rules and if you come up with something innovative (like SegWit) you have to fight for years to get everyone to agree on it?
How would you feel like if you learned one day, while you are away not occupying your house, that I sold your house's title to 10 more unsespecting customers who each believe that he/she owns the house. Thats what banks do. They create fake claims on real products and services and they sell it to masses as a recipe for prosperity. And the result is as we see now, the contrary. Bitcoin is not even close to being perfect, but again, I know that I can trust it.
I understand your point, but you're missing the big picture. The people who got the government to build the Internet used the government to build a technology that they could not control and that was inherently liberating. Telling them that they're betraying their principles because they're working on "the government's network" would have been severely wrongheaded.
What are we trying to get the banks to do? That's what is important.
I'm out there every day actually doing something significant about the problem. And we've formed an army of smart people who are all passionate about it. Come to San Francisco some time and talk to us.