RE: Is Steemit Facing A Potential Big Scam In Progress?
This is how it is.
I couldn't care less what anybody thinks. I don't really have political views per se, so it doesn't bother me one bit whatever people want to spew. I just get irritated by demonstrably false assertions. That woman you keep calling a "robot", if you spend 5 minutes looking through her instagram, you can see her walking and talking. 5 minutes! That's shorter than how long it takes to write 10 replies to people accusing her of being a robot. Are there robot sex dolls on the internet? Yes, they've been around for many years. Is this lady a robot? No she is not. This makes what you're saying about her a LIE, and an easily debunked one at that.
I realise you people in America are in a post fact era, as evidenced by the daily garbage coming out of your president's mouth, but when you come online with that nonsense, the rest of the world will call you out. Obviously not all Americans are like this, but I think you get my point.
Consider that all the same rights you're touting also apply to me. You don't like pretty women, or robots, or whatever, so you opt to write about them and spam their posts. You have your right to do all that. Likewise, I have the right to disagree with you, and downvote your post because it is disinformation. If you want to give, you must be ready to also take.
I guess you miss the part where I stated more than once even if I gave what I said the benefit of the doubt there'd still be people posting a picture and getting rewarded for stuff other people get penalized for. That's the problem here, walking and talking on Instagram isn't enough to qualify you for being rewarded for posting your picture. Maybe she should do videos of herself walking, talking about the environment around her, introduce people to the businesses and opportunities while vacationing in her city if they choose. Maybe go to the beach in a bikini and talk about what beach it is and what amenities are available along the shoreline. Brains plus beauty?...who could argue with that?
I think you fail to realize the number of people rising up all around the world telling people like you what you think our future will be like is going to be forced fed to us is not going to happen. I realize the press doesn't depict the fact that fifty three thousand people showed up to back our president in Texas the other day, over forty thousand in Minnesota last week. No what you think and other globalist think is good enough for us just isn't panning out in the eyes of people around the globe.
No, disinformation would not leave open an option if wrong I am not beyond apologizing or that my assessment could be wrong. That's the part you conveniently ignored in your attempt to hide my opinion.
"She's a robot" you said.
"She's a sex doll" you said. Repeatedly.
It took me 5 minutes for "someone like me" to find this and totally debunk your lie.
https://www.instagram.com/stories/highlights/18079137571059912/
You can literally see her photographer, who appears to be her boyfriend, taking photos of her. Some of those same photos posted on Appics. That's some "sex doll" eh?
You wrote an entire post predicated on her being a "robot". You are a liar. #fact.
That didn't prove anything other than a Instagram account exist. Since I am not on Instagram I guess you'll have to go there and find a video of her doing something other than just posing to "fully" compel me to give the apology I offered to give from the get go....you know, the part in the post you want to ignore. If you hadn't ignored it the first thing you would have done is went and found something to disprove me and ask me to spill the beans on that apology. Which would have also saved all this back and forth, which may have also helped out on those oh so important first impressions which leads to followers.
Nope.
The correct step is to ensure you are not telling a lie before you post something slanderous online like you did (repeatedly). That way you're not spreading misinformation, or worse disinformation.
Also, her instagram account is public.
So you gotten nothing to prove she does more than nod her head. Okay.
Are we back to lies again?
It's only a untruth if you can prove it to be otherwise. Stay tuned I am not done yet.