Review of famous Isu Station optician

Review of famous Isu Station optician

A few months ago, I reviewed fittings here and I thought I should try fitting them later.

I lost my old Lindberg glasses.

Wearing glasses before Lindbergh was not uncomfortable for weight, runoff,

Previously, I bought it from Pyeongchang-dong A-gyeongwon about 5 years ago and I didn't get any fittings.

Even if the price went a little, I would go to Isu station and get the fittings right.

When I first went, I asked about the inconveniences and life patterns that I had before, but it was a little uncomfortable to see the left eye less.

I think it's the first time I've had such an optometry for a long time.

It wasn't just because of the frequency. I was very impressed and satisfied that you were trying to figure out the cause of the inability to see the left eye.

In the past, I wore a square model named Dennis, but the women around me said that round glasses are much better. (The round glasses were matched and lost.)

This time it's common, but I decided to buy Morten or Robin, and I tried Robin Out.

An optometrist recommended a wide temple and said the size is 48 or 50 is ok. The 48 is thinner and lighter.

I decided to talk about 48 and did a fitting. There are a lot of fitting reviews.

It looks like I used it to focus the lens

I've seen some recent reviews, but I've been worried about expensive lenses ...

Why is it rumored to be expensive here? I don't think it's an extraordinarily expensive optician at all.

Ah, eyeglass frames are mainly expensive brands. Renault Zanja Lindberg and so on.

Why do you think it's not expensive? Just another neat neighborhood where I went? There's no difference between the opticians and the lenses.

20% discount on eyeglass frames and lenses. The price is discounted from the price tag. The price tag is the same price everywhere.

Those with bad eyes often left a late review

I have been wearing glasses for 20 years, but 7 years ago I used a spherical lens cheaply. I tried aspheric lenses about 7 years ago, and I tried double-sided aspherics 5 years ago.

Personally, I was not very satisfied, so I was worried about this.

I recommended adding a prism (which is definitely more eye-friendly) and I showed you the ZEISS price list, as it was good for ZEISS and Tokai to freeze

It was the same price tag I found on the internet before, and if the index of refraction is 1.6 enough, it is enough internal aspheric surface

The price difference between the two aspherical surfaces was roughly 80,000 won after the discount, and I chose it as a single-sided aspheric surface

The glasses are more comfortable in terms of fatigue, so I thought there might be a difference between two sides and a cross section.

Usually the price is not in the late stages, but I think there's a reason for it.

If you do a search, it will come out soon.

I did a lot of searching before going to the glasses this time. Anyway ... I thought that refractive index (1.6) is enough.

Diopter is roughly -3.25 ~ -3.5? Astigmatism is about -1.5 -2.5

After knowing the discount rate, I came up with the price range I thought about. For reference, imported lenses 1.6 sectional aspherical price is roughly in the middle of 100,000 won.

I know that ZEISS is more expensive than Hoya, and we handle domestic, so it's cheaper. Hoya was a little cheaper

These days I'm boycotted by Japanese, so I decided to go wise.

When I searched five years ago, I went to Pyeongchang-dong which came out a lot. I reduced a lot)

There was no expensive lens recommendation that I didn't need for me. I didn't recommend Tokai like the reviews.

I didn't care much about the two-sided aspheric recommendation, and I didn't like the blue light blocking personally.

Oh, I asked you to add the coating

Anyway, I'm satisfied. I think you're satisfied with the service, even if it's expensive.

I was satisfied with the price and service.