RE: Request Network (REQ): Higher Highs in MACD & Price
@Haejin and @ranchorelaxo, Please consider sharing one or two vote a day to support the growth of Steem (indirectly it's price). Realize that the people flagging you are very experienced and knowledgeable about Steem's ecosystem and instead voting toward supporting growth and development initiatives we are wasting our power trying to send you a message.
Should you reduce your self-voting by one or two votes a day and reward instead some of what you think could have the greatest impact, we would all win.
I therefor commit to wasting a full vote from both @promobot and @transisto on one or two of you posts every day until you start sharing. (Resteemed at @flagtarget)
Please talk to @ranchorelaxo if you have to or produce less piece of content a day.
If you're looking for suggestions on what initiatives to support I'm available to talk on discord at Transisto#4061
Thank you.
You tried before to censor my content via an ill composed open letter. And yet here you are trying again to censor on votes. You're basically threatening me...giving me an ultimatum saying that IF I don't comply to your requirements, YOU will attack. BTW, I have been up voting others and if you didn’t even bother to check before threatening, it’s not my error.
Have you considered such self directed censorship initiatives can cause the exit of one of Steemit’s biggest investor? How exactly does a censorship forced exit of $1.45 Mil help Steemit? Better yet, have you also considered how censorship prevented the potential doubling or triple of the $1.45 Mil investment? Do you even realize that your type of censorship is actually driving away investments?
Meanwhile, here is just a small sample of your self upvotes of your own comments. I self upvote as a protective moat against the trolls and haters downvoting. What is your reason?
If you can compell @done and his posse as well as @fulltimegeek to lay off their downvotes on the day seven posts, I’ll have a greater reason to reduce my protective self upvotes.
you complaining about censorship, hilarious.
Your friend starjuno certainly loves flagging people and censoring them for no reason, and you started to follow suit as well. Man those people against Bitconnect really deserved to be flagged to hell
Redacted
Everyone has his own shortcomings and i do wonder why fellow steemians keep ranting and complaining about you upvoting yourself. Right from the time i heard your name and looked into your wallet, something came into my dear mind that possibly you could have invested in steemit. Is it now a crime to self-upvote? Obviously, it isn't! If everyone could get the power, self-upvoting will just be seen as something normal but, since not all fingers are equal we are not expected to do the same thing. Rather, i will advice everyone of us to keep working to achieve whatever our aim is here and stop all these habits of fighting one another in the form of flagging! That sucks!!!
Either i will upvote you or not is a matter of choice as long as i am concerned. I have nothing tho but i always look up to @haejin.
@transisto what you are doing seem really reasonable but I don't think this is a nice approach. First @haejin has investor millions of dollars into steem power, that is a good way of increasing the value of steem.
Another is that the power used to flag him for not supporting the steemit community could be used to support the community yourself.
Steemit is like the world with people having different ideology and reasoning. Just do your good will without waging war with others (trust me you can't understand everyone's reasoning). I wish I could receive this power used in flagging. It is a waste of resources. War doesn't promote the platform. By now the trending pages should be reading people earning above $10,000. Steemit will not crash.
Is this how the whale mafia protection racket works? Each whale forces you to upvote the people or groups of their choice, or you get downvoted by that whale?
Yes.
GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!
I'm 100% with you on this.
Agreed.
But here is a question. What about people who are doing ridiculous self-upvotes and/or circle-jerks that doesn't happen to be @haejin or @ranchorelaxo ? What about them?
I think the only real solution is a protocol level change. We can already calculate how much % of each person's VP has gone to each account. So what if we code the blockchain to burn the additional rewards generated when 1 account uses more than X % of all votes on a single account.
Nobody's voting patterns are not going to be affected. The posts would also gain high visibility. When rewards are burnt the STEEM inflation goes down and everybody benefits without affecting any of the ongoing behavior. Eventually voters will decide if they want to upvote authors purely for visibility instead of giving them rewards and getting curation or whether they want to spread their votes among few people.
This method requires additional work from the devs. But it's fair for everybody. You are taking actions against @haejin because he is visible. Dolphines may manage to do the same without being noticed much. You can only keep an eye on few whales. Whales do have the highest impact. But if they are th only ones getting fingers pointed at, you are doing blockchain wrong. In blockchain Code is law as code is unbiased and affects all universally in the same manner; objectively.
So have a chat with the witnesses and the devs. Put a simple cap and everybody can go back to minding their own businesses and engage in positive actions :-)
What about users with 10, 20, 100+ accounts? The code wouldn't prevent them from forming circle-j*rks. It would just encourage a bunch of bot accounts to spread out the self loving.
I'm certain this is already going on, with some of the posts I've stumbled into.
At least those circle-jerks would be easier to spot. Even the biggest defender of the reward pool has 50+ accounts. We could also add dynamic payout limits based on the number of unique upvoters. This would further require abusers to create more and more sock puppet accounts making abuse easier to spot.
It's not a perfect system but it is objectively better than what we already have.
Sad.
Yes HAEJIN is FUCKING SAD!!! HE makes THOUSANDS per day on here, but will flag anything I say about him so I don't make a penny on the post!!! He is really GREAT FOR STEEMIT!!!
He worries so much about me. He has flagged my account to -2 TWICE. I'm NOTHING on here. I have no STEEM POWER & yet this dumb fuck had me on his mind all day long. He makes sure I can't earn 2 cents on a post. What does that tell you about him? He makes thousands per day, while I try to scrape up a few fucking cents to have this donkey come flag me. All because he didn't like some fucking memes about him. BOO FUCKING HOO!!!! If memes really bother you @Haejin you shouldn't be on Social Media. You should be back in your little safe place you fucking snowflake mother fucker donkeytard!!!
Great work in starting a dialog transisto. @haejin, man cmon already. lol
You tried before to censor my content via an ill composed open letter. And yet here you are trying again to censor on votes. You're basically threatening me...giving me an ultimatum saying that IF I don't comply to your requirements, YOU will attack. BTW, I have been up voting others and if you didn’t even bother to check before threatening, it’s not my error.
Have you considered such self directed censorship initiatives can cause the exit of one of Steemit’s biggest investor? How exactly does a censorship forced exit of $1.45 Mil help Steemit? Better yet, have you also considered how censorship prevented the potential doubling or triple of the $1.45 Mil investment? Do you even realize that your type of censorship is actually driving away investments?
Meanwhile, here is just a small sample of your self upvotes of your own comments. I self upvote as a protective moat against the trolls and haters downvoting. What is your reason?
If you can compell @done and his posse as well as @fulltimegeek to lay off their downvotes on the day seven posts, I’ll have a greater reason to reduce my protective self upvotes.
Go FUCK YOURSELF!!!! You FLAG anything someone says about you that you don't like. You WORRY so much about me. That shows how fucking stupid you REALLY are!!!
@RanchoRelaxo you should turn #Hgin in & collect more rewards. You will receive 30% back from the IRS.
https://www.irs.gov/compliance/whistleblower-informant-award
I said stuff too = moar drama ya'll. Enjoy~