You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Do Steemians approve of righteoushitting?
I'm tempted to say your post title is a tad disingenuous. "Stalking" and "hate" aren't the words I'd use for @sigmajin's little vendetta. He was so proud of himself for finding an error that he went ballistic over getting you to admit your typo. He ends up coming across as a small man, ungracious and prone to obsessing over minute details.
Basically, @sigmajin fell into the "someone is wrong on the internet" trap, and is to be pitied:
Yeah on more considered thought, I agree.
Hope @sigmajin will accept my apology for employing inexact words.
Note I used 'haters' which is a euphemism or idiomatic meme not for 'hate' but the sort of trolling activity that I am referring to. But still it is less specific than your more accurate characterization of what happened.
I don't know what word accurately describes that famous comic? The word 'vendetta' isn't accurate either.
How about a new word 'righteoushitting'?
Perhaps if there was a private message feature, I could have perhaps defused the situation. But I was in sleep debt, rushed, and stressed, so I couldn't really muster the focus to figure out how to defuse in those public comments. @arhag was very well organized with his comment in my blog.
Btw, it continues, sigh:
https://steemit.com/steem/@anonymint/who-pays-for-the-blogging-and-curation-rewards-part-2#@anonymint/re-sigmajin-re-anonymint-re-sigmajin-re-anonymint-who-pays-for-the-blogging-and-curation-rewards-part-2-20160812t203259261z
@sigmajin:
There is a relative debasement happening hourly between preexisting SP and newly rewarded SP. You can't capture that without an hourly series. Please do try to go understand what @arhag and I discussing.
Simply stunning.