Good People vs. Bad People, Right and Wrong, Violence, Knowledge, Education, Purpose.

I went to see my therapist this past Sunday - yeah, I need somewhere to vent.  So I talk to my therapist, who I don't like as a person, and the conversation eventually arrives at "The rightness or wrongness of the use of, and not use of, physical violence, human against human, and whether it is right or not right for an individual and/or for all people".  I advocate for "knocking motherfuckers out".  My therapist believes that the use of physical force under all circumstances by the individual is wrong.  I called him a hypocrite, that he would except all of the benefits that war and violence deliver and ensure, just so long as it was someone elses' 19 year old kid going half-way around the world, to kill and take for this American way of life.  I called him a coward, that he in no way conditions his mind or his body, with regular training for war and violence, and that because of this he's not physically capable of protecting his own wife and children from harm, should the need arise. His feeble, uncoordinated, flailings will prove ineffective against a trained and determined assailant.  I called him a perversion, an aberration, a failure in human personality, that his basic human urge to self-preservation has been compromised, that in him it is not robust and evidencing healthy development.  Now, I leave room for the possibility that in response to a particular point coming up, my therapist wasn't going to advocate that there is ever a time when it is appropriate to break the law.  Perhaps deep down inside, my therapist knows that there are times when violence is called for and knows that he would fight back rather than die or be hurt.  Honestly, I think my therapist is the type that wakes up in the hospital or on the couch, asking "what happened?" I believe is honestly a coward.  More precisely, and I realize that this applies to many of the people who are reading this post but, I believe that humans can be grouped, lots of different ways.  One of those ways is into two classes: Those who can hear (detect and care) and obey the set of instructions coming to humans from a non-human, non-terrestrial, extra-dimensional source and those who can't (but still need guidance) and therefore turn to themselves or their fellow human for instruction.  Let's call these two camps: Those who can detect the presence of God and those who can't.  Now, some will raise the point: "well if God wants to tell me anything, he knows where I am; he can email me".  You've got it backwards.  God never moved away from man.  His currant proximity remains as it has always been.  It is us, the human, who has moved away from God.  We've moved, and in the data vacuum of ignorance, we can't figure out how to get back; we're lost in the darkness of ignorance.  Today.  Fact: this planet is a garden.  A botanical/pharmacological garden; an animal preserve; a pulsating, animated, ever-changing, grouping of systems and life-forms.  Just like honeybees have their function and impact on the garden, so do humans.  We have a purpose.  We exist so that that challange, that "problem (number based)" can be satisfied, or solved.  That purpose is basic and general; with our unique set of attributes it is apparent that our function is to "tend" or manage or care for (fuss over the details of) the garden.  Now, there has always been a biped, a Homonid, on this planet.  Opposable thumbs, front facing eyes, thought capacities on par with brain development.  It is apparent that the human that is prevalent on the planet at this point in time (you and me), is not native to this planet, but rather, was introduced.  We are in invasive species, in the multi-thousands of years long process of executing an invasion.  We are not the human that was put on the planet to tend it.  We are the invading species of man, displacing the species of man that is native to the planet and who's function it is to tend to the conditions of the planet.  Several things: If you examine nature closely you will discover that there are patterns, that things follow certain patterns.  One of these patterns is: Like begets like.  In other words: chickens beget chickens, dogs beget dogs.  Dogs never beget chickens.  If a dog gave birth to a baby bird, or laid and hatched an egg, we would say that that was not natural (normal); we would say that that in "un-natural".  It is the dog DNA that is responsible for a dog, and only dog DNA can reproduce a dog.  If you examine all of the other primates on this planet, you'll discover that they all have a 24 chromosomal system.  No biologist will dispute this.  Humans have 23 chromosomal system and all of the other known primates have a 24 chromosomal system, meaning we did not come directly from them.  And, just so you don't think I'm "winging" it, I can tell you that a chromosomal fusing was made with chromosomes 2 and 3.  Infact, in examining the amount of genetic material that was preserved and going on the overall size (amount of) the data contained there-in, it is deducible, probable, that useful genetic information was removed.  In examining other bits of information and evidence, it is apparent that modern man (you and me) was weakened and that the genetic material that accounts for the difference between weakened vs. un-compromised was encoded on chromosomes 2 and 3.  Homo-neanderthalis for example was a very heavy boned, muscular species.  Their adolescents were like our elite body-builders, in terms of average physical capabilities.  If you have to fight off Sabre-tooth tigers and giant beavers and such, Neanderthal man could and did.  The planet still demands that level of physical ability.  Women still select healthy, muscular men to sire their off-spring.  Nobody breeds for weak and unhealthy or disadvantaged off-spring.  Bipeds have become weaker over the last 50,000 years.  Something with a higher order of knowledge than which we, even today enjoy, started with the base hominid of this planet, and altered it's genetic code, to "create" (cause to exist, what did not exist before) the weakened, relatively frail (in both body and mind) species that is us (Neanderthal man also had a larger brain than Homo-sapien).  We were weakened; made weak.  Why?  Because a healthy Human wants for nothing; fears for nothing.  A healthy man doesn't fear the weak either.  Many wild animals, especially fish, that have never had contact with a human, don't initially flee in fear and panic.  Rather, they're curious, and they will watch and engage a human in their habitats, if nothing more than a sniff or close-up observation.  To compensate for his weakened condition, modern man was made to come across, to the physical senses, in the most favorable ways, like a work of art.  For example: Japenese geneticists trace initial appearance of the group of genes responsible for the Blonde hair types, back to a little over 10,000 years ago, and a particular region of Europe.  Now, 10,000 years ago can you imaging how novel and desirable the first blonde hair young men and women looked, in the eyes of a dark haired and red haired people.  Even if they were received poorly, the mutation itself endured.  We bred it back, stabilized it even.  Please understand, my argument isn't racial, by our common notion, but rather it is a condemnation of the whole species of modern man.  We are not natural.  We are a genitally compromised species, that was brought into existance to undermine the effectiveness and ultimately existance of the natural order and forms of life native to this planet.  We were brought here to destroy the planet.  Not because I say so; says me.  Rather, because when one looks at what we're doing to the planet, and not doing for that matter, one can see that we're destroying the planet.  The honeybee was put here to pollinate the flowers and ensure diversity of life, and that's what it does.  It can't, not do, what it was meant to do, and when it can't do what it was meant to do, the individual honeybee dies.  If all of the species of pollinating, flying, buzzing animal types didn't do what they were meant to do, life on this planet, as we know it, would cease to be.  That is the litmus test: how would life on this planet be impacted if modern man vanished today, and the answer is: overall, the planet would continue, quite well, if modern man were removed from the mix.  Levels and ratios of all things, would return to what we would have to call normal or natural.  A certain amount of woods and bush inhabited by a certain amount of bears (more or less) who breed and reproduce according to (not in spite of) what the immediate environment can sustain, for example.  On a balanced, healthy, planet, natural man can only live in harmony with the other forms of life.  If he abuses the environment that he depends upon, he dies, and soon the environment re-balances itself, leaving an unoccupied niche, for whatever comes along next and is capable of exploiting the vacancy.  There is an un-natural way to live on this planet.  The problem is: it isn't sustainable.  You can't keep doing it, indefinately.  This is the fundamental issue at hand on the topic of good and evil.  Good is that which is whole, balanced, healthy, sustainable, etc.  Evil is that which is incomplete, unbalanced, diseased, unsustainable, etc.  Simple dichotomies.  Modern man (23 chromosome man) has been engaged in a many thousands of years long war against the planets' natural keepers (24 chromosome natural man) and now that 24 chromosome man is extinct, 23 chromosome man is trying to wipe-out, negate, ignore, refuse, replace,etc., 24-C mans body of knowledge pertaining to governance: governance of himself and governance of the planet.  His entire body of knowledge pertaining to governing.  Modern man instead, seeks to govern the planet according to methods that he develops and tests himself.  And the problem with that is that modern man doesn't possess enough raw data to accurately, consistantly identify and implement sustainable methods of governance.  It therefore does the next best thing: it identifies and implements unsustainable methods.  The simple truth is: modern man can do no better.  It is beyond the scope of our existance to do better.  Our brains are not capable of a higher order of planning and execution.  We weren't put here to do better.  We were put here as part of a rebellion against the natural order of things, and every last one of us is set to be discarded along with this unsustainable system, that we give our lives to make work, except for those few of us who choose systems and cycles that are sustainable and natural and are possessing of faculties capable of detecting and responding favorably to the body of data that dictates how to properly manage this garden planet.  The Judeo-Christeo-Islamic or Abrahamic traditions are our most recent recepticles of this kind of awareness.  This is a problem for modern man.  Like dogs, modern man is the product of a many thousands of years long breeding program.  This breeding program has produced a type of man who is particularly responsive to the call of his engineer.  He is uniquely engineered to do what we see him doing on the planet at the moment.  And what exactly do we have here?  A slave-planet.  A social system that you were born into and have no apparent choice about participation in.  Participate or (as it is often done) die.  This is one of the common themes in all systems: join or suffer.  Breed for temperment and disposition; reward the faithful, punish the rebellious.  Why is all of this happening?  The fastest answer is: read the main holy books.  Use this article as a starting point and re-read your Bible and Quran.  Christians, Muslims, and Jews are not the issues.  The world has gone to shit and Muslims, Christians, and Jews helped, every step of the way.  Some people will try to qualify it: "Bad Christians", "Bad Muslims".  All of you are charged to "correct wrong with your hands, if not, then to speak out against wrong, if not, then to know and hate wrong in your heart".  Failure in this critical area allows evil to take over, as it has, and only fear is an exceptable excuse for not acting or speaking out against wrong, and knowledge of right and wrong are still requisite.  A coward dies 1000 deaths. In other words, if you don't fight against that which you know to be wrong, you become wrong.  The fight must be waged whole-heartedly, meaning with mind, body, and soul.  The only thing that you can be certain of is the fact that the currant governing systems of the world are garbage and will be discarded.  When, in 20 years, 200 years, less, more?  I can't say.  But, to the question of: does western civilization have a future?  A resounding "hell no!"  When things are finalized here, where will you land?  

Going back to my therapist for a bit, physical violence (the use of physical force in a defensive or offensive capacity) is central to governing.  The beings empowered with the use of physics in their governing practices are the authorities of this planet.  Here in the western world, in recent times, we've pushed to monopolize the use of physical violence.  In fact, we don't want that ability in the minds and hands of every and all people.  And, for those of us inclined to violence, we don't want to be struck back against, when we choose to strike another.  The question of what is beneficial to all life can't be a part of the discussion because modern man has harmed everybody and everything on this planet, including himself.  Today, we use war and violence to secure our economic interests around the world.  Yes, we use war and violence for other reasons, as well, but without qualification, we use violence and bloodshed to sustain (however briefly) the unsustainable.  All of you are with that.  My therapist is with that.  I talk to him like a dog because I see him closer to what he is: a savage (one step above, and a few generations removed from having a bone through his nose).  The pathetic product of a pathetic social system, one that lies to and preys on its own people as well as foreign people, one that kills un-armed old ladies and children, as it kills armed combatants, around the world.  We killed un-armed civilians for the crimes committed by their "leaders" who we put into power, once upon a time.  A hypocrite.  A coward.  A slave to a social system that promises clean running water, microwavable dinners, name-brand clothes, a pay-check.  Do you know how many people I hear say "I'm just doing my job", as they commit an act against another human, which the Bible describes as a crime.  We live in a time where you can earn a pay-check, someone will pay you, to do a deed, against another human, that the Bible describes as a crime.

I suppose, if there are enough responses (positive or negative) I'll continue to post along this theme, otherwise, just sharing some of my observations and opinions