About reincarnation / Personal opinions.

Today I approached a subject that fascinates me: reincarnation. No photo, no cryptocurrency. A rather controversial topic. Is there reincarnation? Of course we can not say for sure, but we can not deny certain arguments that support this theory. Hinduism and Buddhism are the two religions in which the idea of ​​reincarnation is the most important. The concept of reincarnation gives hope to many people. If we do not do the right thing in this life, we still have a chance in a later life.

However, even those who believe in reincarnation admit that the vast majority of people do not remember their previous lives. Then how can we learn from past mistakes if we can not remember them? It seems that just to be able to have a genuine and unique experience we must look at the past. Use is another law of the universe. It must exist so that man can annihilate karma. Do you think if you knew you were getting married to your other life killer, would you? Can you accept that your sister is the person who destroyed your life and killed you? We seem to be making the same mistakes again and again. The choices of this life will be intuitive. Until we learn our lesson, we will not be able to move on.

Also, reincarnation claims to provide justice. According to the karma law (an impersonal and inflexible law of the universe), in every life we ​​get what we deserve. Our good deeds attract good results after them, and our evil deeds attract bad results from one life to another. We each carry karma from one life to another

What would be the arguments in favor of the existence of reincarnation?

Hypnotic regression

Discussed in the eyes of many, hypnotic regression is perhaps the most popular proof of reincarnation. As you can see from his name, in this controversial technique, subjects are hypnotized and led in the past through their present lives in childhood, and still in the pre-natal period. Once "come" there, they are asked to describe what they are experiencing. In this state of hypnotic trance, subjects often manage to accurately report personal details of what their past lives are supposed to be, details such as geographical location, occupation, relatives' names and other relevant historical and cultural relevant details .

Although in many of these cases the subjects provide multiple and consistent information that they apparently should not have known, no such situation has been accepted as an indisputable proof of reincarnation, as errors always slip through correct accounts, errors likely to cast a shadow of doubt on the whole matter.

Also, many of those who have had a hypnotic regression are described living in Egypt or Rome. Many of these people describe kings, queens or important people. But normal people, have existed in previous lives? What is real and how is imagination in hypnotic regression?

Memories of past lives

There have been various studies in the world on this aspect. During these investigations, the specialists studied thousands of children aged four to ten years, finding that in many cases the little ones remembered their identities in past lives, as well as details of the historical and geographical context of the invoked periods, details of relatives from past families, as well as details on the moment of death. Interesting in all these memories is that "patients" have not been hypnotized or "regressed" in any way to access latent memories, but have exhibited from very young age perfectly knowledgeable, spontaneous, information of past lives. Some of these children fluently spoke the language of the place where they claimed to have lived. I mention that some of the children spoke French or Italian, although they were born in the UK. Beyond these facts, the dialect or accent was unknown at the time.

While all these accounts and tendencies tend to become unclear and even disappear with the years, they remain among the best evidence in support of the idea of ​​reincarnation. A fairly famous case is the child of Taranjit Singh (Alluna Miana, India). From the age of two, he claims that his real name is Satnam Singh and was born in another village, 60 kilometers away.

He claims to have been a 9th grade student and his other father called Jeet Singh. One day, when he returned from school, he was injured and died on September 10, 1992. Taranjit says he has a lot of blood on his books and he has 30 rupees in his wallet. So insistently the child was with this story that his father started to look for whether this really happened.
So he came to a professor who confirmed the story and linked him to the dead student's family. They also confirmed the details of Taranjit's cupping of books and money. When the baby showed pictures of the dead family, he correctly identified each one.

Curiosity pushed them further and Taranjit's parents came to investigator Vikram Raj Chauchan. He took a notebook and one of the deceased to compare his writing. Surprisingly, Chauchan found that the two types of writing were almost identical, despite the fact that Taranjit had just learned to write. As you can see, it is difficult to fight this case. And in the world, there are hundreds of such cases. What do you think? Believe in reincarnation?

Image source: /www.sikhanswers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Reincarnation2-700x511.jpg