Reduce the exposure of everyday life to a centralized system
In the previous article, we learned how flawed the centralized system is. Then how do we begin to reduce the involvement of daily life activities in a centralized system and start to become more independent (autonomy)?
Before proceeding any further, this article continues the discussion based on the previous article "Beware and Monitor the Centralized Management System," to show how far and how deep the rabbit hole has gone.
There are several centralized systems in existence so far. Let's start with the word community. Community is a collection of individuals who gather in an area.
Every member of the community is called a communist. Again, it is not about a communist government system, but it is a literal interpretation of the real definition of the word "community".
The same way a journalist is also called a columnist. Because they make news per column, they become columnists.
Let's return to the discussion of the centralization system. "Centralization" is derived from the word "center," which implies that everything belongs to the central government. Centralization means all the circumstances that make it central.
Community
A community, any community, needs a management system for it to be tidy, so the idea of centralization was born.
Initially, because the environment was small and limited, the potential for centralized management was easier. Therefore, in the past, the terms village head, tribal chief, and similar terms were used.
However, with the increasing number of people and technological advances, creating a community certainly requires a new area at some point, and the community becomes much larger. The idea of combining all communities in the form of villages, tribes, and the likes of these emerged here.
As an area grew larger and more complex, an idea developed, the tribal chief of all the existing tribes. This led to at some point it evolving into a kingdom to reduce the conflicts that existed within it so that political knowledge emerged.
Sadly, each science has three sides to it - one side (which is considered the main side), the other (which is considered the second side), and the neutral (which is considered the edge and melting point of the two coins, sometimes referred to as a synthesis, hybrid, combination, or hermes).
Knowledge depends on the use for which it is intended. This is because all knowledge is either positive or negative based on the people behind it, the people behind the wheel. Knowledge itself remains neutral.
The more complex an area was and the more people lived there, the more control was needed. Thus, the emergence of one social system in the centralization system was used to divide people and control communities. This was so that when needed, they could unite against a common enemy.
"The more complex an area was and the more people lived there, the more control was needed. Thus, the emergence of one social system in the centralization system was used to divide people and control communities. This was so that when needed, they could unite against a common enemy."
The implications of a centralized system on a community which are unavoidable tend to be absolute in value, so this centralized community system is given a different name or label by the makers (agents) of this centralized system.
Let's take a look at the centralized governance systems that have existed so far.
Monarchy. A kingdom is a type of monarchy, which is a form of state management (government) system in which power is held by one person, namely the king or queen.
The specific criteria used to classify monarchies may vary, but one general categorization is based on the degree of centralization of power within the monarchy.
Based on these criteria, here are some types of kingdoms:
a. Absolute monarchy: A monarchy in which the king or queen has complete control over the government and there are no limits to their powers.
b. Constitutional monarchy: A monarchy in which the powers of the king or queen are limited by the constitution or laws and there is a clear distinction between the powers of the monarchy and the powers of an elected government.
It should be noted that different monarchies may have different forms of monarchy. The specific structure of the monarchy may change over time, for example through constitutional amendments or reforms.
Centralized government based on religion. The Supreme Leader, who is the religious authority, holds supreme political and religious power, and an elected government is responsible for the administration of the country. It is based on religion, not religion itself.
It should be noted that countries with centralized governments based on religion will differ from one another depending on the religious system itself. And also the specifics of government structures may change over time, for example through constitutional amendments or reforms.
Unitary government. The central government has full control over local government and all powers are vested in the central government.
Federal government. The central government shares power with local governments, with each level of government having different responsibilities and powers.
Confederation. A loose association of political units, in which the central government has limited powers and most power is vested in constituent political units.
Devolved government. Almost a decentralized-like system in which the central government has transferred some powers to local governments, but the central administrator retains supreme control.
All of these centralized systems were merged into 5 classifications, namely: Monarchy, Democracy, Liberalism, Socialism, and Based on Religion.
In the end, all that really exists is a system in which all individuals gather into large communities. Every individual in that community is referred to as a communist in any system. Therefore, every individual is called a communist in a system of monarchy, democracy, liberalism, socialism, and based on religion.
Throughout history, centralized systems including monarchy, democracy, liberalism, socialism, and based on religion have resulted in centralized structures and policies that are used to manage (govern) a country and its people. The "elite" people who manage the state are called the government.
The classification of centralization systems one by one by definition
Monarch. A system of centralized kingdom is a type of monarchy, which is a form of state management system (government) in which absolute power tends to be held by one person, namely the king or queen and or prime minister.
Democracy. Yes, I know, it's not a government, but rather "the voice of the people." But is a centralized vote system for state management carried out by state administrators (government), in which power is held (imaginary) by the "common people", either directly or through elected representatives (presidents). Democracy as a tool to manipulate its own "common people."
Another name for a democratic system in the form of state management is called a republic. Democracy is characterized by (ostensibly) free and fair elections, the rule of law and the protection of individual rights and freedoms.
Liberalism. A system of political centralization that (seemingly) emphasizes individual freedom and equality before the law.
Libertarians believe in limited government intervention in the economy and society and prioritize individual freedom, private property and free markets.
It's so free that there is a tendency for state administrators to be corrupt, the state managers (government) tend to not care about "poor common people", if a citizen who is seriously ill is about to die, well, just die, that's what happened in many countries adhering to the liberal system.
If you need health insurance, pay for it in advance. Nearly every liberal system of government assumes that citizens are customers, obliged to pay.
Even though "the common citizens" pay income taxes, one of the obligations of the state manager (government) is to ensure the health insurance of its "common citizens", not just its own "elite citizens".
Likewise the pension fund, why only "state employees" get it, even though all "private company employees" are obliged to pay taxes, then why only "state employees" get pension funds? Where does the "income tax money" of every private company employee end up?
As employees of private companies, if they wish to have a pension fund when they grow old, they will "pay again" by saving at X institutions run by the state administrator (government). That is likely the potential scenario.
Employees of private companies pay twice. First of all, there is the so-called "income tax," which they will never get back. The second, if they want "pension funds", they need to save their money first for the state administrator or institution, so they can get a "pension fund" later on, which is in fact their own savings, which is also subject to taxes in old age when saved as a "prospective pension fund".
State managers (the government) always win, right? The question is, where is the money from "income taxes" being spent on employees in private corporations by the government? Do they share it with their own "elite" people?
Such samples are indicative of the business attitude of a corrupt state manager (corrupt government) utilizing a liberal economic system milking its "common citizens".
Socialism. A system of political and economic centralization that (ostensibly) prioritizes collective ownership and control of the means of production, with the goal of achieving the same equality and prosperity for all members of society.
Give your land, your house, your garden, your rice field, everything to the government. Everything is collected from the "common people" to the government for equal prosperity, which is in fact only for the "elite". While "common people" are in a mess, the elite splurge, then manipulate them to "still dream" about achieving "social equality".
In theory, socialists believe that the distribution of wealth and resources should be managed by the government to address economic and social inequality, but the reality is far different.
Based on religion. Regardless of religion. It is based on religion, not religion itself.
Everything is regulated based on religious rules that are believed and adhered to by most of the community.
So pay attention to the fact that within a religious system "Always believe and use faith, don't think outside of it, faith is more than enough".
That is how their pressure on citizens is based on religion. An essential characteristic of a centralization system is its control over its own "common citizens".
It should be noted that different countries may have different forms of government affected by these systems. In addition, the specifics of government structures and policies may change over time, for example through electoral or reform processes.
It's unique in that a centralized system can combine two out of five existing systems for its state administration and economic system, so it's as if the centralized system favours something that's only "discourse" as a tool to silence its citizens for those who are critical of the potential corruption of such a system. The economic system plays the most crucial role.
A country can combine two of the five systems that exist in the main centralized system
The state management system (state administration) in the USA is democratic/republican, but the liberal economic system, which plays a crucial role in how the country is run, is not democratic at all.
These two things are actually very contradictory ideas. Every decision is made democratically, but the economic system is liberal. Therefore, the one that comes out on top is the liberal economic system and does not care about democracy at all.
In a liberal economic system, state managers (governments) are more or less identical to a corporation where citizens are the consumers they are "milking".
In addition to serving as the state manager (government), the state manager also regulates citizens' lives, so "democracy" is actually only meant for "discussion" and "entertainment."
It is a well-known fact that when corruption in a centralized government system is exposed, critics of "wise common citizens" are silenced. Additionally, brainwashed fake wise leaders like to remind common people that their ideal beliefs come from what they call "ideal discourse," which is worth fighting for, which reduces future conflict.
Another example of a centralized system of state management (state administration) of a country can be a democracy or a republic but the economic system is socialist.
There are many countries like this. In all existing centralized systems, the economic system plays a dominant role, not the management system (state administration).
And what's unique is that the five centralized governance systems that we have so far tended to claim unilaterally that their system is the right one and has its own fanatical adherents and has its own "master" of the economy, even though all of them are centralized systems.
Everything is a community ala centralization. Every individual in it is called a communist, whatever the name of the centralized system is.
The mutual claim to excellence is an arena where one centralized system community competes for dominance and control over another state-centralized system manager as part of Hegemony, Information, and Slavery (hegeformasavery) in the technological age.
Insisting that their centralized system is the most effective method of ensuring this information plays an active role in the global international arena.
Of course there are those who directly or indirectly gain from this conflict within the centralized system itself. Who will benefit?
Yes, the political elite in this system, the elite who benefits from it, this elite is known as "agents".
They intend to divide their citizens even at the global level. Ordinary people will be occupied, fighting among themselves, and that is how "the agents" control them. Common people will forget there is another system that is capable of providing a solution, namely decentralized systems.
Independent by being a farmer
Start with the words self-sufficient, autonomous, or decentralized. Someone can live independently, and this can be implemented in even the tiniest area.
Farmer. A farmer is actually allowed to grow their own food, own rice fields, gardens, as well as raise goats, cows, buffaloes, and poultry.
Back then, farmers were actually very independent (self-sufficient/autonomous/decentralized), primarily exchanging goods using barter systems. And the good news is you still can do it now.
As a form of food exchange, farmers tend not to require fiat money issued by a centralized governance system. Being a farmer reduces a person directly to the control of the centralized system used by the government for fiat money.
Farmers who grow their own food and raise cattle without using state-issued fiat money have relatively little exposure to centralized systems.
Some countries with a centralized system are trying so desperately to reduce the number of farmers in their countries. Their citizens became less farmers as a result.
This is because with fewer farmers, it is easier for a government to control its citizens. Hence, targeting economic growth in a sector other than agriculture may be pursued by corrupt governments. Even if it means creating a rule that growing your own food is illegal. Controlling the food enabled it to control the people when fiat money failed.
Due to this, in addition to not thinking about agriculture, they are seeking ways to stimulate economic growth. These ways include looking at the sea, becoming factory workers, importing and exporting, and modernizing villages to become cities.
Another way to paralyze farmers is to implement a birth control system or what is often called family birth control planning. Two children are sufficient, but the aim is to cripple the next generation of farmers by not having enough offspring to manage their land.
To avoid appearing overly obvious, efforts towards "self-sufficiency in food" are encouraged, while the government focuses on birth control for farmers with birth control programs.
In the city women and men may be manipulated against one another, arguing over feminism and misogyny, and forgetting about their potential offspring. As a result, men and women do not want to create the next generation. In this way, it is easier for the government to control them.
And corrupt governments tend to prefer imports of agricultural food from other countries because it is more "profitable" for the "elite".
So the word independent, autonomous is synonymous with decentralization. It is very critical to start living independently at the lowest level in order to reduce centralization.
If you live in a city, you must start growing and producing your own food, even if it is in a tiny narrow area. Hydroponics, for example, can be used in a narrow area like a vertical system to optimize space.
If someone lives in the city and experiences the difficulties of city life, it is barely possible to get food. It's always a wise idea to return to the countryside and become self-sufficient, prosperous, and have enough to eat and drink.
Individually autonomous decentralization
It has been proven that being self-sufficient through basic food security can make an individual more able to survive when the policies of governments are corrupt and they limit the freedom of their citizens.
For example, during the (deliberately created) viral pandemic several years earlier. A virus pandemic during the Second World War or perhaps the last one was also planned by corrupt governments. To control its common people.
The next thing is to avoid connections with any banks in the centralization system, because they are not serving the interests of the "common citizen", for example, if you want to borrow a "start up business fund", the condition is that the business has already been running for at least 2 years.
How is it possible to borrow in this way? Yes, there is always a way to manipulate data, but it should be easier to avoid doing it. Also, the system is designed so that not many can become entrepreneurs. Another way to reduce corrupt government control is to become an entrepreneur.
Is it possible for entrepreneurs to succeed without the government's centralized banking system?
Of course they can. They can borrow from a credit union institution. Credit unions are a decentralized financial system.
The more businesses are not connected to a centralized banking system, the more difficult it is for corrupt governments to implement and control their citizens.
Now many entrepreneurs are starting to use crypto money (cryptocurrency) because they know it is more profitable and not affected by inflation, or the potential for their accounts to be frozen by state administrators.
Saving relatively crypto money using stable coins or coins that are stable at dollar-equivalent exchange rates, for example USDT, USDC or the like.
To start using a crypto wallet or crypto wallet, please register at the following links: Coinbase, Binance, and Crypto.com. Free mining Pi Network here and follow the next steps given there. Welcome to the era of financial decentralization.
+++