REDEMPTION vs REPENTANCE

/ / / / / / / ○ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

Why the Jews Are Not God's Chosen People (2024) | The Dance of Life Podcast with Tudor Alexander

REDEMPTION THROUGH ATON E MENT (Aton's mind)
or
SALVATION THROUGH REPENTANCE (Christ's mind)

~○~

Good video about fake Jews, Jews 3.0 etc., however it still promotes Pauline Christianity along Jewish concepts of redemption ("the term implies that something has been paid for or bought back, like a slave who has been set free through the payment of a ransom") of atonement through blood sacrifice, basically a business transaction, opposite of what Jesus the Nazarene has preached of salvation through repentance; with the law of one God, meaning all is God and nothing but God exists, and thus love for God, oneself and the neighbor.

Jesus was confronting the Temple priests who were practicing mass slaughter of the innocent animals at a tune of hundreds of thousands a year while making much profit at it, whose 613 Babylonian Torah laws were enforced on top of the ten commandments of Moses, made sure steady supply for the need to atone redemption as was later done by the Catholic Church issuing indulgences, basically turning the absolution of sins into big business.

●
/ | \

Atone, as in tetragrammaton, tetra (four) gramma (letters) Aton (Akhenaten's henotheistic chief diety of the power of light, who was prototype for biblical Moses).

Anyway, Pauline Christianity is Roman Jewish hijacking of the original Essene-Nazarene Jewish movement that has developed as a branch of Judaism rejecting the Temple sacrifice practice of the Babylonian Talmudic Rabbinical matrilineal establishment, and like the patrilineal Karaite Jews prior have also rejected their Talmudic Mishnah interpretations of the scriptures, which is in many ways contradictory and out right outrageous.

Thanks to Pastor Aaron Abke for his sermons.

SUPPLEMENTARY

/ / / / / / / ○ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

LAWS

Jesus was not preaching to follow 613 laws of Torah but the ten commandments of Moses which he has reduced to the law of one: one God, love thy God, love thyself and thy neighbor, and by neighbor he meant those who are in need. Jesus was against Temple sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of innocent animals in redemption, as in business transaction, to atone (Aton) for the sins. Instead he was teaching the Nazarene creed of salvation through repentance, changing one's mind and heart towards God, who will then forgive and absolve all the sins and wrongs out of his love for us for he is omnibenevolent, omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent one and only God. Amen

/ / / / / / / ○ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

JESUS vs PAUL, JOHN vs THOMAS

What is clear reading the red or even pink letters of what Jesus have said or could have said, is that Jesus, as the leader of the Nazarene Jewish sect branch of Essenes, was preaching about the Law of One, that is to say that there is only one God, therefore one must love God, oneself and thy neighbor as thyself. That salvation comes through repentance (changing mind) not through redemption (transaction) in order to atone (diety Aton) for the sins. Nazarenes were vegetarian and were against the practice of innocent animals being slaughtered at a tune of quarter million a year for no good reason since they didn't accept any justification for it provided by the Temple priests who were making lots of money with their 613 Torah laws on top of Ten Commandments of Moses who nobody could keep by design.

Then the character of Paul has appeared after Jesus has disappeared preaching, rather clumsily, how Christ's death is in redemption to atone for all humanity's sins thus no more animal sacrifices are required, no laws of Torah are needed, no circumcision, no kosher, no even good works are required as James would have you believe, all is needed is for one to confess that Christ has died for your sins, that he then resurrected in flesh and blood, said hi before ascending to Heavens where he is sitting on the right of the throne of God his father obviously, plus hail Marries, and viola all sins are gone, the slate is wiped clean so that you can start sinning again. Perfect system of perpetual life in sin and Bob is your uncle.

JOHN vs THOMAS

"The Gospel of John and the Gospel of Thomas present contrasting views on Jesus and his teachings, with John emphasizing Jesus's divine nature and the light within him, while Thomas highlights the potential for divine light within all people. John also appears to take a polemical stance against the teachings found in the Gospel of Thomas." G.AI

"The exact identity of John – and the extent to which his identification with John the Apostle, John of Patmos and John the Presbyter is historical – is disputed between Christian tradition and scholars.

The Gospel of John refers to an otherwise unnamed "disciple whom Jesus loved", who "bore witness to and wrote" the Gospel's message. The author of the Gospel of John seemed interested in maintaining the internal anonymity of the author's identity, although interpreting the Gospel in the light of the Synoptic Gospels and considering that the author names (and therefore is not claiming to be) Peter, and that James was martyred as early as AD 44, Christian tradition has widely believed that the author was the Apostle John, though modern scholars believe the work to be pseudepigrapha." Wikipedia: John the Evangelist

EVANGELION (Good News) vs GOSPEL (Go Spell)
HOLY SPIRIT (living) vs HOLY GHOST (dead)

So, obviously John is political ideological polemical rhetoric.
Am sure the Flavians had something to do with it. How many people could read at that time, and out of those how many could write, how many knew Latin and Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew, Syriac whatnot, and even then how many could write what they wanted not working as scribes for someone else, also knew the history and myths, were well educated, but even after all that could actually publish, distribute, and promote without the fear of being persecuted for it? Only the bloody royals and high priests could afford and were able to do it, write under different pseudonyms as witnesses to their own narratives, incognito so as to not spook their subjects into revolt if they got a wind of the amount of bs sent their way under the disguise of freedom of speech and press.

So, naw, am not buying the bs about some nobody with no intent other than to witness the truth of good news, evangelion, wrote some scriptures that went viral. Imagine how much money it will take to produce a scroll today, then multiply it by a million and that's the chances of some poor shmak writing anything never mind being copied and popularized. That is a state run operation not an individuals activities. The hell they are.

There are powerful interests at play here including Roman empire, Hellenic Greece, Babylonian commercial law peddlers, animal sacrifice of Temple Judaism, Persian Zoroastrianism, Atenism, etc. whatever royal dynasties and high priests, black nobility, merchant bankers, Assyrian loan sharks, then the Essenes, Abionims, Nazarenes in opposition to Temple zealots and Rome. So there is much going on during the Second Temple Judea at ancient Canaan in Levant of West Asia. The devil is in the details, the God is in the big picture. Whose picture is the reason for so much controversy.

I reccomend sermons by Pastor Aaron Abke on YT on this and other biblical and spiritual / early Christianity topics.

   ♡

_ \ \ | / / _