Personally speaking, is it possible to form an opinion without facts ?
OR EVEN DARE I SAY,
A fact without without any preconceived opinions?
Of course, both are very possible, but the nature of difference in these modes of perception lie at opposite end of the spectrum of rationalization, diverging from assertions of scientific thought, where only one objective truth can exist in any body of cohesion .
A nihilist might reject most facts while supplanting their opinion for reality. On the other hand someone like a tenured professor might reject all opinion to profess reality only in terms of institutionally accepted rationals.
IMO you cannot come to a conclusion without the framework of the process.
I would like to hear any examples you might have on this other than freedom and equality.
Freedom and equality have become very subjective in our society and could be manifested linguistically to an infinite degree. I would love to hear your argument for their contradiction if your up to the challenge, in any case thank you for your time and honest thought.
Love this reply (comment) and well put. I will address fully when I have more time. But absolutely, "society and could be manifested linguistically to an infinite degree" in a way that is the "mighty value" we have to a basic understanding on, well... anything. lol. But it does make one think about... what would someone's understanding (in regards to reality, facts or opinions) be if one was deaf and mute and blind. What would a natural thought (without body or indoctrination) be like? Yet linguistics is a fascinating mind fuck. Much like, how people think of the word "God". https://steemit.com/linguistics/@neilradimaker/god-gods-and-the-cryptology-of-sacred-texts