I'll never discourage people from reading what they wanna read because I think it's "garbage" or "useless."

With respect to some of the people out there, it seems that most people who wanna take a "deep dive" into Project 2025 are people who read one book or fewer a year. They seem to be doing this because they think it's eminently relevant. It's not. If you're not a voracious reader and a policy nerd, it's just a waste of time.

I might as well take a deep dive into PETA's ideas to confirm that they're nuts and believe what they always said to gain credibility in my own head when I post crackpot claims that Biden will ban pet ownership and vaccine that use animal products in his next term because a DC non-profit that is kind-sorta on his side said so.

There are a lot of gun control non-profits who support Biden. It would be insane for me to go into any of these organization's stated plans and insist that this is gonna mean no private gun ownership in four years if Biden gets elected. What wouldn't be insane is for me to know that Biden is bad on gun rights. I know that by listening to him. I don't need to take a "deep dive" into the agendas of the DC non-profits.

I know we're gonna keep hearing about this crap, and about "how much research" you did. There's nothing anybody can do about it. Granted, reading Project 2025 all the way through and discovering that it was a complete waste of time is less of a cost than living among the DC non-profit people for several years to discover how useless they really are. Still, just about anything would be a better use of time for most people.