RE: We Are All Racists
A "breed" in a dog such as a Pitbull is not inherently more violent than a German Shepard.
how much do you want to bed on that?
Breeds only exist because humans enforced it into existence but there is nothing more about it than that.
other species enforce it as well. this is how the environment works.
So of humans force dogs to mate in a certain way so they'll be better at racing? So now we have the grey hound. This doesn't mean the grey hound "breed" can be compared to human "races" because there was no domestication where some master forced humans to mate over thousands of years.
oh yes there was. it is called the african savanna ecosystem. the indo-europea..heck even slaves in united states were bread like animals in order to produce the most strong one. dana-edwards. you need to do ridiculous amount of reading. this is like 101 sociology.
You can bring up Egypt, and slavery, and you can bring up some times where there were arranged marriages, or where there is rape, but the fact is the majority of humans on the earth weren't raped, and every human has ancestors who were slave masters and slaves, so that is moot.
actually for hunderds of thousands of years..except the last 6000, humans were raping each other much like other animals do, forcing themselves to breed.
In a lab setting, yes you can create races by forcing humans to breed in unnatural patterns,
labs exist in the natural environment. you keep using that word "aritficial". i don't think it means what you think it means sunshine.
but there is no forced eugenics right now and even if there was, race is still just a social construct which wouldn't exist on it's own without some government, or dictator, or religion or something to enforce it.
lol. rich people right now choose traits for their children based on genetic engineering. poor people can't do that.
dana dana dana...you talk so much..you say so little...
I did back up what I say with some sources. You've offered none to support your hypothesis.
So the point? Yes you can remove certain traits from a population if you use a domestication process over a very long period of time, but it took thousands of years to tame dogs, and then hundreds of years more to have what we now call "breeds". Human beings don't have enough control over each other for a long enough period of time to do that, even in the context of slavery there was never that much control over mating.
I could be wrong, and maybe you can show me some documents which support your thesis, but you haven't. If we look at the genetics of black people today, or white people today, we don't see anything genetic which shows any sort of evidence that they have innately different traits.
So unless you believe black people are inherently better at sports (which you aren't saying but you hint at by saying slavery enforced stronger offspring) then you're spouting conspiracy theories and myths without any scientific (genetic) evidence to prove it happened.
Provide some evidence for that.
Bet? I would go with the science no matter what the popular myth has to say. There is no scientific factual evidence to support that Pitbulls are more violent than German Shepards. If we are tracking dog bites, then we don't see that Pitbulls bite people more on average. There is no evidence that any breed of dog is inherently more violent than another.