You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: BIP 1 – Targeting Voting Power
I was thinking about this last night. I think the fairest situation is to have a cap on the maximum up vote.
This way all your users can gain access to an equal share, thus removing the first come first served and luck element.
This also may lead to an increased number of individuals leasing power to QS as they can directly see benefits as you could be raising the maximum upvote allowance.
I know I am desperate to lease power (but don't yet have enough!).
I would agree this being a very fair option for everyone, that way qustodian power is still kept to a good VP thus benefitting the same amount but maybe to less people
I agree that a cap is fair to everyone, but how big must the cap be? Some kind of measure where the cap updates every day based on the usage yesterday or every 12 hours or so?
Also you can lease even small amounts to Qustodian and get a return. I think if the payouts change back to daily it would help support smaller leases as it gives time for a fund to build up?
There can be dynamic payout of leases to ensure that everybody gets some money, but with a cap on the maximum number of days till payout?