Question mark
Nowadays, the use of "?" in the headlines of various newspapers has become a kind of "fashion."
From the content point of view, most of them are not to ask readers or the society any questions or questions, but mostly belong to "fuzzy news" for "show".
To say that this type of "news" is used as a "show" means that its authors (including reporters and correspondents) are eager for quick success, alarmist talk, and dismiss the so-called "important news" or "exclusive news" without clarifying the truth and the ins and outs of the facts. Seen in the newspapers, bewitching readers and sensationalizing
But I was afraid that the "parties" or readers would be held accountable for framing, spreading rumors, falsehood and fraud, so I deliberately used "?" as a shield in the title, so as to use it as a shield to evade responsibility when in trouble.
Such people who use punctuation as a "show" are no longer "pioneers" in the press. The real "first movers" are those people who often use the "one of the most..." sentence patterns, they and the people who often use "?" in news headlines are the people who know news best, knowing several "elements" of news , Know how to grab the "first time".
Therefore, without saying "the most" for fear of not being considered as "good news" and saying "the most" but also afraid of being inaccurate, boldly "innovate" and describe what should be "the only" thing as "the most... One", there are many birds with one stone, it can be described as a magical plan! Let us have to admire, and even want to applaud them!
It is true that the authors of the news and the newspapers who published their articles are the ones who have gained both fame and fortune, but what about the damage? I'm afraid it's not just readers, it's likely that there are also the initiators!
I hope this kind of "fashion" will be less, and less!
If this development continues, I am afraid that the news will not be able to be read in the future. Moreover, this trend does not know how far-reaching the impact will be in the future. This kind of meaningless or ulterior habit should be as few as possible.
I thought of the past articles again, which seemed to be more concise, like ancient Chinese without extra symbols, no extra words and vocabulary, it seemed very convenient.
Why not learn from the ancients?