You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: First-Rate Intelligence Requires Integrity

in #psychology7 years ago

How can two diametrically opposed ideas be held in the mind and considered to be equally valid? This is an absurd statement. As Dale Carnegie once stated to be one of his cardinal principles, it is important to try to see things from the other person's point of view. One can try to see things from the other person's point of view without accepting it as equally valid as one's own opinion and should do so as a general principle to maintain intellectual integrity. For an idea to be valid, it must correspond to the real world and how it functions. A valid idea can be employed to make accurate predictions about the future, and successful predictions in turn tend to validate the idea.

Sort:  

When you consider the life experience of the person you are engaging, ethnic background, lack of previous exposure to the same body of knowledge that you have - lack of common reference as it were, and these same considerations apply to yourself as well, then you should be able to "see" that you and the other have arrived at the best conclusions possible, given limitations. From this point on, a shared learning experience is possible ...

There is no debating long established truths .. ie. flat earth vs round .. what I refer to is more in the realm of belief, and the increasingly complex. The person who believes themselves 'absolutely correct', waveringly so, is usually not so much, and not very interesting. :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.13
TRX 0.12
JST 0.024
BTC 51367.14
ETH 2266.57
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.01