Hi @ura-soul, thank you for your comment.

You make an interesting point here in regards to ‘judgement’. I think we have some common grounds with this however I disagree with your conclusion. The scientific method involves doubt (denial is similar but its more the ignorance of consensus in my understanding), scientists develop theories and try to find all the ways in which they are wrong. Then they pass it to other scientists that also try to find all the ways that they are wrong (the process is surprisingly brutal, we’re certainly not all one happy family that agrees all the time). If the theory is still standing after a barrage of attackes (argues in the scientific liturature), then what you are left with is a strong foundation of knowledge that you can build on. Open mindedness is great for the development of new theory, however, it doesn’t mean that all ideas are equal. Each needs to be rigorously tested first.

My argument towards ‘trust in science’ is that we have now got to the stage in our society that no one person can understand all of science at any one time its essencial that we trust in the work of others. To more forward from this point (and prevent more suffering, thats all that I care about) I have to trust that other scientists, and the work that they create, have gone through the same rigorous process as I have (I’m ten years into my training and I still don’t think I’ve made it to an ‘expert’ in my tiny sub field of health psychology).

I notice a recurring theme with this topic that people often just assume they are right and try to play the 'appeal to authority' card that says 'the experts say xyz and so they are right'

If this is what you’re seeing then I highly agree with you on this point. Any expert worth their salt should never make the argument that they’re an expert so they’re right! The mark of an expert is the ability to assess the quality and impact of the research in a particular field in an unbiased manner. An excellent expert is able to have constant arguments in their head about all the ways that any sentence they write could be wrong.

Thank you for the video link, I promise I will watch it at some point. Although I will say that I’m not an expert in vaccine science, I’m a psychologist that studies public perceptions so my ability to engage with the content itself may be limited.