You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: STEEM PROPOSAL: Create Different Types of Posts For Different Use Cases -> First Use Case = STEEMIT REVIEWS
So how is voting power going to work? 1 review per person - 1 vote - 1 person? Or does it have to be backed by serious SP to prevent sybil corruption of the review data set? I think each way has its own issues. The first can draw a very large crowd (but also fake votes), the second can almost eliminate fake votes but make the sample far smaller.
Are you asking about how the Average Score will be computed? I thought it should take into account every review's Overall Score equally and get the average of them. If Steemit users feel like a review is unfair or biased, then the review could be down-voted, which would then remove it from the item's overall score.
SP-backed up votes only come into play when it comes to how much someone gets paid for submitting a review, deciding the main picture and synopsis of any certain item that is reviewed, and the order reviews are displayed on an item's page.
Aha, ok, the first paragraph explains it to me.
I guess SP also needs to come into play in the downvotes somehow that adjust the average score due to Sybil. It is complicated. The OP is not fully worked out, but I think it could be eventually with more thought and peer review. This is meant to be a basic outline.