There are two ways to look at this reward curve:
at the moment of the vote, your vote carries a certain value according to the place of the post in the reward curve. If you are among the first to vote, your vote carries less value.
at the same time when you vote early, you will get a higher percentage of the pie from curation rewards.
I think the vote value at the moment of voting isn't the best indicator because this value can evolve. You vote with a certain amount of STU. The more STU the post or comment will get, the higher it will be in the reward curve.
So, in spite of everything, I believe that it is important to vote quality posts early and encourage other people to read these posts.
Project hope: a perfect solution for post HF21
All the people that work around project hope write constantly interesting posts and also most of the people have substantial Steem Power.
If as a community we vote for each other and spread our posts, we all win. The new settings of HF21 encourage communities to merge and support each other.
I believe that the project hope is a great tool for all of us:
- for authors to have their posts seen and upvoted
- for curators to find quality content that will probably have higher payout levels and higher curation rewards
- for investors to use their Steem Power with high ROI of curation rewards
P.S: Please correct me if I got things wrong ;-)
Dear @achim03
In my humble opinion.
Friend I think you are absolutely right and the way you explain it is very easy to understand the new operation of this HF21.
A big hug from Venezuela
Thanks for the feed-back my friend!