My our text
Thank you very much for your writings, unfortunately others want to see what cannot be seen, and assume that they feel obliged in this case to just give you the clarifications that sometimes I more than recognize the real case already for these moments, it was more than all give the following message, it is true that “so-called arbitration is always a problem and a reason in itself”, not because of the judge, who as we have been learning over the years, and for which they are not always given the best and most honest manifestations of the process, but only the search for punishment matters. Thus, in traditional trials and justice, innocence is assumed and guilt is sought, elevating things to levels and creating establishments.
Echoing the famous process there in distant Greece of the inspirers of the mother of sciences: philosophy.
This is, and always has been, philosophy: And who better to build it as a scaffold for future defenses of what would later be Roman law, a model for other rights.
Professor Estagirita's phrase: in the last of his books, the laws, which says that it is bad to write, we know this because there is precisely the risk of misinterpreting it, but there is another worse evil, which is assuming that those who did not write and They didn't leave their writings for us to read, they didn't do the dialectic as the author of the dialogues claims.
Since in many cases the form of budgets and unique reasons for the evaluation judgment are attributed to them; although; As I have opportunely pointed out on several occasions and in repeated cases, the platform's poor arbitration practices, pointing out my initial articles and not just malpractice, unethical, incapable and bad faith on the part of a “supposed” qualifier, without raising the observations that were pointed out to you; As the process was only unilateral, it took me a long time to remove the platform, as I saw and noticed the unpunished actions against this despicable and unjust individual. Now, there is at least a veil and a formality of observation that may or may not be noticed. But for a long time there was silence and therefore fraud on the part of the platform regarding these repeated cases of this terrible element of the platform. Nor have I seen any mention or public reparation to this day or to me. Therefore I reiterate that it be done as required of me, do so; those responsible and they are sanctioned; because not only did I repeatedly take the complaints to point out their lack of stylistic resources and knowledge of my mother tongue, given that the individual who served as referee was openly a person whose mother tongue was not Spanish, and therefore both of your observations were more than childish and without minimum resources of objective qualification. In addition to first pointing out this harmful issue, specifically and individually. Not only did he ignore but he did not justify his observations, and the answers were given in English and never in Spanish. I will be grateful if you can take up my case again, but the demand for minimum standards must be a universal right, and we cannot continue to allow the impunity that is claimed of me, but which is openly complicit in the case of a supposed arbitral authority. Without further ado, and looking to republish it as soon as possible, thank you. And for now, without further things to propose...
Let us rejoice in the freedom that develops and is exercised with the sole specification of not being detained by critics or the enemies of creativity, who unfortunately are increasingly zealous guardians of executing what they suffer because they are neither the weak nor the brave. .. Athenian princes who ended up asking for something they didn't give, except as the brave and feared Spartans referred to them: "the effeminate Athenians, philosophers". So each of them are the narratives of their own earrings and their own centers of gravity, their own cultures determined the value they gave to things and after the war with the Persians it will be another big change.