RE: Post Truth Apocalypse And The Death Of The Expert
Fairbanks, AK – On September 6, 2017, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Dr. Leroy Hulsey.
Chair of UAF’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, presented some damning findings and conclusions detailed in his team’s September 2017 progress report regarding the collapse of World Trade Center building 7.
and some other report - september or october this year,( I think...)
Experts Reject Fire As Cause For 9/11 WTC Collapses
Technical experts are mounting major challenges to official U.S. government accounts of how three World Trade Center skyscrapers collapsed symmetrically and in near-freefall as part of the 9/11 attacks 15 years ago.
Does this mean - assuming you''re are not an expert- that you've changed your position, or do you still believe the 'official narrative BS'?
Question:
Is there a govmtn (official narrative) that you do not agree with?
such as?
I actually linked you to a video with NYFB (fire brigade) footage of bdg 7 from an angle not often seen, and it was quite clear that bits of falling plane and masonry had destroyed the building and it was near collapse.
But of course that's an "official narrative" so you instantly dismissed it.
I'm not getting into this again with you, it's akin to arguing with a cat, no matter what you say the cat will simply repeat its meow :-)
Cg
ok, I was referring to the new report and 'experts', is all.(your post)
How you reconcile the contradiction, is my point?