Thanks! This interview went in a lot of different directions and the source evidence was not always provided - however, having checked into what I can with regards what was presented, I found nothing that could not be backed up with evidence. My own personal position on all this is probably a bit different to Richard and Neil, but I do agree that whatever lines there are in society will be exploited by the covert controllers.

Are you expecting the West should just agree to become a melange of races, religions and creeds that will magically all unite when the elites stop 'dividing' them?

Firstly, I don't see our planet in terms of a 'west' and an 'east' - these themselves are artificial boundaries that don't really exist. It is paramount to clear up our definitions if we are to see the light of absolute truth and it is only from absolute truth that we can understand life and improve our experience.

Secondly, the only truly white person is a dead person - except for some albinos who could be from 'black' families and black/white skin colour is no guarantee that everyone in those groups will be conforming to the stereotypes involved. In short, there is a groupthink occurring within some members of groups in society that is exactly what I am pointing at in my post and that includes those who identify as 'white' or 'black'. Before we are a skin colour (adaptation to sunlight exposure), we are human and before we ware human we are spirits. To define who we are by a skin colour is hugely limiting and a mis-representation of fact. Yes, there are groups who are primarily light skinned and others that are dark skinned, who think similarly to each other - often just because they only talk to each other and are pressured to conform since they falsely believe that if they deviate then they will lose power and protection afforded by their group structure. What they are missing is that they mostly only need protection from OTHER GROUPS LIKE THEIRS! lol... So if all the group just learned to heal, balance and evolve instead of fight, fear and compete - these problems would mostly end.

There will always be disagreements in life, but regardless of their details the important thing is to learn to respect free will. If we all respect free will, then there is no problem. This is something that is almost completely absent from the minds of many, with some even claiming that free will doesn't even exist.

The points being made in the interview regarding artificial divide and conquer strategies do not relate to 'getting everyone to live as one' - they only relate to exposing how divisions are being exploited on a massive scale to control almost everyone.

None the less, it IS possible for us all to live in harmony and that requires us first and foremost to be willing to break the mental and spiritual shackles which limit us to thinking that such a thing is impossible.

Black and white societies have never gelled well together and been 'equal' no matter the historical period, geographical location or political situation. What evidence is there that all races of the world have common cause and it's only the elites the stir them up?

The problem has always been heartlessness and it continues to be heartlessness. The same heartlessness that sees people paying others to torture and kill millions of animals every day and call it 'normal' - even in the face of mountains of evidence showing that their own death could be caused by eating the dead flesh. The same heartlessness that causes people to support genocide and war instead of finding workable, peaceful solutions.

In short, we need to learn to love ourselves internally and only then will we have the love needed to give to others and find balance. There is no other solution to these problems on Earth.

I do not personally accept that 'race' even exists - I see only adaptations, choices and preferences made manifest and then taken on by individuals who form apparent groups. The 'common cause' of humans who intend to live is BALANCE and SURVIVAL. There is no way this could ever be any different - but so many are invested in causing imbalance and making sure that we don't even look into the mechanics of actual balance, that such simple equations as these go un-noticed.

Is not the preference for living amongst one's own kind one of the most natural and long standing inclinations known to Man?

My 'own kind', if I have one, are 'living beings who intend to be balanced, happy and creative'. There is no artificial boundary necessary for who is included in that.

What would be wrong with ethnostates alongside multiracial states for those who voluntarily wish to be a part of them?

Free will means freedom of association and there is nothing inherently wrong with people joining together with who they prefer to join together with. The motivation for doing so is the main issue for me.. Are you looking to do that to truly create something that benefits humanity - from a state of having truly accepted the full depth of the situation in all ways possible? Or are you doing it using logic that contains denials, judgement and that is ultimately powered by fear? Most people will react in a knee-jerk way, when asked such a question (about any topic) by declaring that 'I don't have any fear' - but it usually only takes me about 20 seconds to ask them a question which demonstrates that the do have fear that they are in denial of.

It is unwise to make decisions while in a state of fear. Better options exist.

I have not yet seen the videos, but what evidence is there that the mainstream is somehow encouraging people to see the Alt-Right as benign? The media likens them to 'Nazis'. Furthermore, those 'Nazis' of today actually hate the Alt Right for being too tolerant of homosexuality.

I don't think it is helpful to try to describe large groups of people with judgements such as 'group x thinks y' - there were plenty of homosexual nazis in germany and probably are among the neo nazis today. The point made in the videos refers to media sources such as infowars and breitbart, not to 'the media' as a whole. Even Steemit is part of 'the media'.