You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Liberland Is Everything Roger Ver Wants, But Not What Roger Ver Needs
Your whole text sounds like a revenge post from a teenager after making romantic avances towards Roger Ver and being rejected. And the only thing (you call it an argument) you could come up with is a completely random expectation you had about what he should do in order to be consistent.
Yet I am the one being emotional :)
So be it. You win, I lose.
wow, what an excellent argument! I am amazed
What you thought was a great argument against Roger Ver was in fact nothing but the logical fallacy called appeal to hypocrisy. People frequently use it in absence of arguments.
'look, he's talking about freedom but did not move to liberland!'
As if that were an argument for or against anything... I tried to hint at that in my first reply to you, but without luck.
Ps: you can now proceed to ad hominem attacks, your default replacement for arguments.
Did you drop the mic there? You should have... or mouse or smthg. Bullseye!
I also got the feeling they were close, since all the assumptions and opinions were presented as facts. "I know what Roger thinks". He wants his kingdom... Because when Jedlička does it its Liberland. When Ver, its a kingdom. And misconceptions about Ripple and BTC... Because banksters took it over and screw up what BTC was meant to be to crush it and replace with their Ripple... It means cryptos have nothing to do with decentralization? It seems the author doesn't understand the basics. How could he understand others like Ver?