The data suggests that UBI would only be temporary.
one example of declining costs
another
because of this
In the US, today a poor man lives better than a King,
did in times past
I suggest that we need UBI for a short while only,
until we are over the hump so to speak.
The data suggests that UBI would only be temporary.
one example of declining costs
another
because of this
In the US, today a poor man lives better than a King,
did in times past
I suggest that we need UBI for a short while only,
until we are over the hump so to speak.
Of course you do, you're a non-libertarian. But why would it be inevitable if libertarians deem it either unnecessary or undesirable?
Also how could UBI be abused exactly?