On the principle of free speech

in politics •  2 years ago

As of late there has been an animated discussion in the public sphere about the importance of free speech, and what, if any, restrictions should be put on speech. While this is an extremely important debate, I think its also looking at the parameters of the debate itself.

One of the most-oft used arguments by those who support free speech is that any laws passed to design "bad" speech (however "bad" is defined, ie hateful, racist, offensive, ect) will inevitably be turned around to suppress "good" speech, which would ultimately be counterproductive to the goals of those who favor restricting "bad" speech. While this argument is compelling and grounded in history, I would suggest it is not the only, and perhaps not even the most important, argument in favor of free speech.

What is lost in this argument is the matter of principle. To many (myself included), principles are far more important than policy. This is a philosophy not limited to free speech. For example, many people are against stealing. They don't oppose stealing simply because they are afraid that others would steal from them, they are against stealing - taking what does not belong to them - on principle.

Free speech is a principle. The ability for individuals to express themselves without threat of violent repercussion is the cornerstone of a free society. Absent this absolute right, there is no freedom, only despotism. When any group of people can decide, at the point of a gun, what the parameters of debate may be you no longer have a free society, no matter how offensive or "bad" the banned speech is.

Many deride the idea of "more speech" as not being a cure for "bad" speech. That's true - more speech is not a cure, but better speech is. Spreading good ideas and principles through free speech, education, and empathy to those people who are misguided and alienated is the only way to deal with hatred in a free society. Those who advocate using threats of violence, whether at the hands of the mob or of government agents, to deal with "bad" speech are no better than the people they decry.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @stanislavpetrov! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You made your First Vote
You made your First Comment
You published your First Post
You got a First Vote

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Clear, simple, and to the point; I like it. Couldn't have said it better myself!

As strange as it seems, this needs to be repeated over and over again in our time.
Upvoted!

True words. I can respect appealing to principle, though I do not always find it the most rational justification for things. What you are doing is putting your foot down. That I can respect.