Simply enough, because however suspicious of Trump I might be, I've gotten to be even more suspicious of anonymously-sourced stories about Trump from the Washington Post, the New York Times, and frankly, from all of the legacy media.
Why? Because they've proven to be untrustworthy. Becket Adams at Washington Examiner started a comprehensive list in February, promising to keep updating the list -- after February 18 he stopped and I don't blame him. He probably threw up his hands in disgust. Mollie Hemingway at The Federalist has her own list (and some useful hints about any WaPo Trump story).
Your claim was "Trump revealed highly classified information" - that claim is false. It's false when WaPo says it, and it's false when NYT says it. ALL of the people who were actually THERE say it's false. #FakeNews for rabid dupes.
No, in fact, he did not. The WaPo story is complete BS.
Here's a good take on the nonsense coming out of WaPo & the Slimes: Should We Trust the Trump/Russia Coverage? A taste:
So you're saying he didn't share information?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/politics/trump-intelligence-russia-classified.html
Your claim was "Trump revealed highly classified information" - that claim is false. It's false when WaPo says it, and it's false when NYT says it. ALL of the people who were actually THERE say it's false. #FakeNews for rabid dupes.
Propaganda, that's all this story Is, anyone putting out this sort of lies Is spreading disinformation.