Revolutionary philosophy in capitalist eyes

in #politics7 years ago


Any revolution or political event can be seen in two ways. One is with the eyes of the liberated man, the other is the capitalist-imperialist, the one with the eyes of the exploit-class. In the many countries of the world including Bangladesh, the centenary of the October Revolution is being celebrated to create new motivation for the liberation of human liberation. On November 9, Hasan Ferdous wrote in the first light, "Russian Revolution in the Century, with Different Eyes". It is a different eye. He wrote, influenced by the eyes of capitalist-imperialists or against their anti-revolution and slander and propaganda. So this revolution saw the emergence of 'dictatorship dictatorship'.

There are various techniques of bourgeois propaganda about the October Revolution and its subsequent socialist system. One of them is preaching that in post-revolution Russia or many people were killed. Hassan Ferdous presented a dramatic description of the murder of Ghulam Ambia Lohani's death scene, as if he had seen the scene standing beside him. There is no reason to believe in the large number of murders he has received. The sources that he has used have no credibility. Lenin, the great leader of the October Revolution and the creator of socialism in Russia, has given the image of Stalin, another great man of human empowerment. It seems that cruelty and killing should be characterized by their characteristic characteristics.

Many great artists, poets, writers, philosophers, scientists, economists, intellectuals or honest true journalists can be mentioned in the world; Those who were fascinated by Lenin-Stalin ideology, but were fascinated by the Soviet Socialism. Because, they have seen with the eyes of humanity or with liberal views. The socialist Soviet society attracted them equality, friendship, discrimination and humanitarian aspect.

During the Stalin era in 1930, Rabindranath Tagore was so impressed by traveling to Russia that he considered this journey holy like a pilgrim vision. He praised the socialist construction of various aspects of his thinking by considering 'the biggest historic altar in the world'. He said, 'What I liked in my eyes is that he is totally devious of this treasure.' (Russian letter)
Rabindranath's eyes are not 'different eyes' mentioned above, rather the eyes of humanity.

Likewise, standing in the opposite direction of the ideology of the October Revolution, England's chief priest Dean of Canterbury, Reverend Hewlett Johnson, traveled to Russia and wondered, "The Soviet Union has said exactly what Jesus Christ said to do." In a memorandum on April 18, he spoke about Stalin Are also "leader Stalin, but another kind. He has come to power, not with terrorism, but with the characteristics of teachers, scientists and organizers. "He said that all the nations were led by the leadership of Stalin, in the nationalist movement in the emergence of independence, the movement had taken place in Asia.

After Stalin's death, the then Prime Minister Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru had said similarly about Stalin, 'When he fought, he (Stalin) proved himself to be a great warrior, but he always influenced the influence of peace .... It is the man who, in his lifetime, created a friendship bond with love for many people and love . '

According to Hasan Ferdous, it is ridiculous to claim the Soviet system as 'the world's best democratic system'. Because, according to him, it was either 'autocratic dictatorship'. But the world-renowned sociologist couple Sydney Webb and Wietrich Webb have been in Russia for three months in the decade of 1930s and wrote a new book titled 'New Civilization', in which they did not call the Soviet system as 'political democracy', they say the President or Britain's Prime Minister Stalin Much more autocratic than They called the Soviet society as a 'new civilization'. Nobel laureate and writer George Bernard Shaw wrote about his book, "What the British British have so far said about the communist Russia is the falsity of falsehood. The web couple gave us this first piece in the first scientific analysis of the Soviet state ... and on the unwise state, the Soviet system was declared a new civilization. This book is the best of their life. '

Famous French literary Ramon Rolando welcomed the Soviet system as a new civilization. The English scholar Professor Herald J Laski called the Soviet Union "the precursor of the new civilization" in Liberty in Modern State, written in 1949, which has a vast amount of material (spiritual) and spiritual (Spiritual) achievement.
A very brief list of this achievement can be mentioned here. The October Revolution was the first to establish equal rights of women and men, including women's suffrage. There was no women's right to vote in any European and American countries. There was no prostitution in the Soviet Union. There were no racial or ethnic persecution. On the other hand, during the sixties of the last century, racism was a formidable form of America. Even the black people hanging on the trees were the victims of a lot of murder, which is called Lynching. For this, the protest author Mark Twen gave the United States the name 'United Lynching State'. Due to the presence of the Soviet Union, all the countries are fast welcomed

Sort:  

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @lowlylutfur to be original material and upvoted(1.5%) it!

ezgif.com-resize.gif

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63131.59
ETH 2586.04
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.78