You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Could Crypto ideas go mainstream? (Part 2 – Politics)
kinda bizarre for me to think that in the end, how much we have invested is how we are voting here.
yet should there be a limit, to the power any one person can have? and is there such a limit in place? do we want such a limit? the time may come when someone learns to game the system the best. should they then be allowed ultimate voting power?
i say that is exactly what our governments are like now and we had best prepare to mitigate such a inevitability.
Any system that has flaws is eventually going to be gamed by those for self-interest at the expense of the overall system. It is why systems need to be constantly reformed and evolved - because no system is flawless.
You are absolutely correct that this is the problem with our current governments and bankers. Our systems are being heavily gamed by those in power now and our systems have not been significantly reformed or evolved in a long time. It still amazes me that in most countries we are using an archaic paper based electoral system that is hundreds of years old, when the rest of the business world and broader society is using the latest computer and communication technologies.