Just a reminder, if you are thinking about Voter ID Laws
Author's Note: this post was originally on my website, dated 30Jan2017.
Written on 28Jan2017, after I was asked about VoterID Laws. This was mostly copied (partially verbatim) from the ACLU's Voter ID Legislation Fact Sheet, and I added some Minnesota-specific details. This post came to be because someone was asking if anyone had a good reason why Voter ID Laws are bad, and I found out that simply linking them to the ACLU's website would not work.
Obtaining ID is expensive. In Minnesota, a State ID (not even a driver's license) starts out at $19.25, and then there are fees for different kinds of payment, fees if you need to get duplicate forms because yours are missing or damaged due to time/theft/accident/other incidents, and so forth.
Obtaining documents to get a ID cost money. In Minnesota, birth certificates are $26.
It can be extremely difficult to get to a government office to get a new ID for those who are disabled, elderly, or live in a rural area without access to transportation.
The Government Accountability Office has found that strict Voter ID laws reduce voter turnout: http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665966.pdf
Minority voters disproportionately lack ID, generally for the above reasons.
States exclude forms of ID in a discriminatory manner. Examples:
A. Texas allows concealed weapons permits for voting, but does not accept student ID cards.
B. Until its voter ID law was struck down, North Carolina prohibited public assistance IDs and state employee ID cards, which are disproportionately held by Black voters (and those are government-issued forms of identification).
C. Wisconsin permitted active duty military ID cards, but prohibited Veterans Affairs ID cards for voting (another government-issued form of identification).A Caltech/MIT study found that minority voters are more frequently questioned about ID than are white voters. http://vote.caltech.edu/documents/84/vtp_wp59.pdf
Since 2000, there were only 31 credible allegations of voter impersonation – the only type of fraud that photo IDs could prevent – during a period of time in which over 1 billion ballots were cast. https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/a-comprehensive-investig…/…
So-called cases of in-person impersonation voter “fraud” are almost always the product of an elections worker or a voter making an honest mistake, and that even these mistakes are extremely infrequent.
Voter ID laws are a waste of taxpayer dollars. Examples:
A. Texas spent nearly $2 million on voter education and outreach efforts following passage of its Voter ID law.
B. Indiana spent over $10 million to produce free ID cards between 2007 and 2010.
If you like what you read here, and would like to show your support, please consider donating.
I am on Patreon to help fund the work that goes into maintaining a website and creating researched content. Also, it will give me some financial relief as I am also endeavoring to complete a number of science fiction and fantasy stories, and hopefully compile them into zines or collected works. As a sponsor, you'll get quality blog posts, early access to completed stories, and the knowledge that you are helping me fund the creative process. I will get the benefit of some stress reduction as I won't have to worry about finances as much anymore, and that will help me be free to create more work.
It's not always possible to sponsor on a monthly basis. If you would like to do a one time donation, please feel free to use PayPal, SquareCash, or Venmo. Producing content takes time and effort, and any support would be most appreciated. Your donations help me cover expenses and eventually will let me be able to create quality content full-time.
It is consistently frustrating to me that voter ID laws continue to crop up. While I don't think it's an unreasonable idea, I do think that government issues IDs should be provided without cost. Removing the cost would remove a significant barrier to getting a photo ID.
Very much so.
Another issue is that each state has a different rule for their identification cards, and there is no national ID card because people are so terrified of the federal government using it to track them and creating a "slippery slope" to surveillance by the feds and crap (which has led to the social security card, a card that is not meant to be used for ID being used as a form of ID).
Which also means that anti-immigration groups are for a national ID and pro-equal rights groups are against a national ID. And MN had to deal with the worry that Minnesotans wouldn't be able to board a plane without a passport because of the Real-ID laws that were passed (side note: we can still fly with our current IDs until 2020).
I really feel like ID is an easy issue for us (as a nation) to come together and make a compromise. But that's become a 4-letter word in recent-ish years.
True. Partisanship is very much on the rise - it is most disturbing. I point out in The GOP is not the Party of Lincoln - A Brief History. Part II: Progressive Booaloo that partisanship has been on the rise since the 19th century and provide citations.
Hell, it can be seen when looking at the electoral history of Minnesota and how it is becoming a swing state.