Sort:  

First you claim that this elected president may declare martial law and make himself dictator, which I assume we'd all consider a bad thing. and in the next breath you question if it matters who wins our next election. Explain the contradiction.

But, I don't think it matters who the president is because it is the same people pulling the strings.

“Forget the politicians. The politicians are put there to give you the idea you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land, they own and control the corporations that've long since bought and paid for, the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pocket, and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and the information you get to hear." George Carlin

I ended it with this, "These are just predictions of how 2016 could end. I am telling you here that you shouldn't be surprised if something like this happens." ... So these are predictions, not saying it's 100%.

But you aren't making any sense. If you believe all the polititions are already bought and paid for, and the country is being run by some massive corporate conspiracy, there would be no need for marsial law. What you are saying sounds to me like this.
Maybe a bear will eat the rapper Jay-Z before January, 2017. I don't say 100 percent it'll happen, but it might.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.14
JST 0.028
BTC 59274.98
ETH 2600.78
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.44