"The Law," by Frédéric Bastiat: Why It Matters
I serialized this work because the ideas it confronts are still with us today. The Law addresses flaws in political thought by stripping away pretense and propaganda. Just like in the France of 1850, the "left" and the "right" alike seek to use the force of law as a means to commit injustice in the name of their special interests.
This book should help build an understanding of the classical liberal principles whether you wish to "work within the system" or build communities outside the sphere of governmental control. Never forget that any sound concept of rights and justice must be universal and reciprocal. Nothing is more heretical to the State religion than pointing out that more often than not, the new legislative intervention is trying to address the unforeseen consequences of past interventions, addressing one injustice by merely imposing another on top of it.
The series of posts is linked below along with an excerpt from each:
Part 1
Each of us has a natural right — from God — to defend his person, his liberty, and his property. These are the three basic requirements of life, and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other two. For what are our faculties but the extension of our individuality? And what is property but an extension of our faculties?
Part 2
Self-preservation and self-development are common aspirations among all people. And if everyone enjoyed the unrestricted use of his faculties and the free disposition of the fruits of his labor, social progress would be ceaseless, uninterrupted, and unfailing.
But there is also another tendency that is common among people. When they can, they wish to live and prosper at the expense of others. This is no rash accusation. Nor does it come from a gloomy and uncharitable spirit. The annals of history bear witness to the truth of it: the incessant wars, mass migrations, religious persecutions, universal slavery, dishonesty in commerce, and monopolies.
Part 3
if law were the obstacle, the check, the punisher of all oppression and plunder [...] If the law were confined to its proper functions, everyone's interest in the law would be the same. Is it not clear that, under these circumstances, those who voted could not inconvenience those who did not vote?
Part 4
It is indeed impossible to imagine, at the very heart of a society, a more astounding fact than this: The law has come to be an instrument of injustice.
Part 5
Can the law — which necessarily requires the use of force — rationally be used for anything except protecting the rights of everyone? I defy anyone to extend it beyond this purpose without perverting it and, consequently, turning might against right. This is the most fatal and most illogical social perversion that can possibly be imagined.
Part 6
When law and force keep a person within the bounds of justice, they impose nothing but a mere negation. They oblige him only to abstain from harming others. They violate neither his personality, his liberty, nor his property. They safeguard all of these. They are defensive; they defend equally the rights of all. [...] But when the law, by means of its necessary agent, force, imposes upon men a regulation of labor, a method or a subject of education, a religious faith or creed — then the law is no longer negative; it acts positively upon people. It substitutes the will of the legislator for their own wills; the initiative of the legislator for their own initiatives.
Part 7
Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all.
We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.
Part 8
This section consist largely of quotations from other authors with commentary.
It cannot be disputed that these classical theories [advanced by these latter-day teachers, writers, legislators, economists, and philosophers] held that everything came to the people from a source outside themselves. As another example, take Fenelon [archbishop, author, and instructor to the Duke of Burgundy].
He was a witness to the power of Louis XIV. This, plus the fact that he was nurtured in the classical studies and the admiration of antiquity, naturally caused Fenelon to accept the idea that mankind should be passive; that the misfortunes and the prosperity — vices and virtues — of people are caused by the external influence exercised upon them by the law and the legislators. Thus, in his Utopia of Salentum, he puts men — with all their interests, faculties, desires, and possessions under the absolute discretion of the legislator. Whatever the issue may be, persons do not decide it for themselves; the prince decides for them. The prince is depicted as the soul of this shapeless mass of people who form the nation. In the prince resides the thought, the foresight, all progress, and the principle of all organization. Thus all responsibility rests with him.
Part 9
Further quotations with commentary
Now let us examine Rousseau on this subject. This writer on public affairs is the supreme authority of the democrats. And although he bases the social structure upon the will of the people, he has, to a greater extent than anyone else, completely accepted the theory of the total inertness of mankind in the presence of the legislators
Part 10
Actually, what is the political struggle that we witness? It is the instinctive struggle of all people toward liberty. And what is this liberty, whose very name makes the heart beat faster and shakes the world? Is it not the union of all liberties — liberty of conscience, of education, of association, of the press, of travel, of labor, of trade? In short, is not liberty the freedom of every person to make full use of his faculties, so long as he does not harm other persons while doing so? Is not liberty the destruction of all despotism — including, of course, legal despotism? Finally, is not liberty the restricting of the law only to its rational sphere of organizing the right of the individual to lawful self-defense; of punishing injustice?
Part 11
The strange phenomenon of our times — one which will probably astound our descendants — is the doctrine based on this triple hypothesis: the total inertness of mankind, the omnipotence of the law, and the infallibility of the legislator. These three ideas form the sacred symbol of those who proclaim themselves totally democratic.
Part 12
As long as these ideas prevail, it is clear that the responsibility of government is enormous. Good fortune and bad fortune, wealth and destitution, equality and inequality, virtue and vice — all then depend upon political administration. It is burdened with everything, it undertakes everything, it does everything; therefore it is responsible for everything.
If we are fortunate, then government has a claim to our gratitude; but if we are unfortunate, then government must bear the blame. For are not our persons and property now at the disposal of government? Is not the law omnipotent?
Part 13
And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works.
Related series: That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen
Updates can be found here.
If you like this post, please comment, follow, and resteem!
![SteemVerify](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh141/lordtothe/jacobtothe1_zpsai6oygyj.png)
If you like this post, please comment, follow, and resteem!
Thank you for your thorough and enlightening theory on The Law. While I was reading these summaries I thought how especially leftists want to revise The Constitution, to update it to our times, because those guys couldn't have imagined the circumstances we live in today. I think from reading what the Classical Liberals were thinking at the time, they very well could imagine these political trends. That's why they tried to establish a government that safeguarded against the abuses of a pure democracy and severely limited the power of each official. But the law in America has turned into an instrument of injustice anyway over time. I would be interested to hear your informed take on that.
Unfortunately, people tend to be blind to the political plunder "their side" politically supports and enacts. The "left" and "right" alike have their own pet plunder projects. Injustice is always OK with them if the victim is in a class they think it's OK to marginalize.
Agreed. I'm vacationing on the West Coast now and it's funny how some states will give you certain freedoms (legal marijuana) but restrict others (I was in a city that has banned all public smoking). Just shows neither side is for real freedom and the liberties they allow you are another system of control.
Well, if you're passing through the Spokane area, give me a holler! I wrote a post a few months ago about an especially interesting situation a bit north of where I live.
I won't make it up there this trip, but I would love to one day. That's exactly the kind of thing I was thinking about. It is an interesting situation.
This post is bookmarked in my interesting posts folder for further perusal when I have had more sleep than a gnat harassed horse on a hot August day. And yes, I am making next to no sense, I am allowed that feature.
You might be awesome for cataloging and sharing Bastiat with us all, as well as offering commentary. That is all.
Thanks! I hope the serialized format makes his work more mentally digestible!
"The Law" is one of my favorites. It is one of the first writings that really opened my eyes to reason and the real purpose of law and the use of force. One of my favorite quotes is the first two sentences:
"The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it!"
Thanks for the reminder.
It was also a very influential book in my exploration toward liberty.
I also discovered John Smith, Étienne de La Boétie, and Lysander Spooner around the same time. Spooner really punched me in the gut and opened up anarchy for me.