Eurotribes, Ukraine War

Some experts claim that all wars are Bankers Wars and in recent centuries there may be some truth to that. That is simplistic however; wars generally have more than one cause. Homer claimed that the Trojan War was fought over a woman... in real life , the Trojan War appears to have been a drug turf conflict such as you might find in large democrat-infested US cities (See Troy McLachlan's "Saturn Death Cult"). The one verifiable case of a war being fought over a woman would seem to be the story of Borte, that first wife of Genghis Khan's...

One cause of wars that is easy to overlook is people simply hating each other and , as is often the case in Africa , the question of national boundaries not respecting tribal boundaries. That appears also to be the case in the present conflict in "Ukraine". Russians and Ukrainians are different tribes.

It is easy enough to see how Russian leaders might have miscalculated and how Russians may have assumed they would be welcomed as liberators going into their special military operation. Russians and Ukrainians are both Slavic Orthodox Christians and you might think that tribal boundaries would start to blur, but they don't. The following article provides a number of Clues to the nature of the problem:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/09/will_ukraine_survive_intact_.html

The war exposed Ukraine to two of her most critical vulnerabilities – questionable legitimacy and extreme nationalism. Legitimacy derives from acceptance and recognition. However, Ukraine’s neighbors Russia, Poland, and Romania do not accept their current borders with Ukraine.

Basically, Ukraine is not a real country; more like a Nazi military organization and army occupying territory which, over a period of several centuries, has been expropriated from Hungary , Romania , Poland , and Russia. None of those countries recognize any official borders between themselves and Ukraine.

After the First and Second World Wars, the borders of artificially created countries such as Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, and Ukraine were delineated to replicate the geopolitical engineering. So, when Ukraine proclaimed her independence, she did not proclaim her independence from Russia, Poland, and Romania’s territorial claims... ...After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Ukraine got its borders within which she achieved independence and millions of Russians, Poles, Hungarians and Romanians were trapped in a newly created country.

Now, pluralistic societies can actually work when there is a basic level of respect on all sides. Thus, the Yugoslav Federation with its 25 or 26 different ethnic groups did work other than for Albanians (who nobody could get along with) and the Russian Federation works. In fact, in such a legitimately pluralistic society , diversity can actually be a source of strength. But that is definitely not the case in Ukraine. The article goes on to note that:

The Ukrainian problem is greatly exacerbated by the fact that unlike pluralistic societies such as the USA, Canada, Switzerland, and Russia, which are tolerant of different cultures, religions, and languages, Ukraine is not. Unsurprisingly, devotion to pluralism proved not to be her forte. Even though the Kiev regime had no historical roots in the real estate it inhabited, it imposed Ukrainian rules and the Ukrainian language on non-Ukrainian people after declaring independence. It is worth pointing out that even in the Soviet Union, where Russian was the official language, the Ukrainian language and literature were compulsorily studied by everyone in Ukraine.

As a result, pro-Russian sentiments – ranging from the recognition of the official status of the Russian language to outright secession – have always been prevalent in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. Western Ukraine has always gravitated toward its Polish, Romanian, and Hungarian roots. Emphatically anti-Russian, Poland may not miss this strategic opportunity to re-acquire its land and avenge the humiliation inflicted by the Yalta Conference...

...During the conference in Crimea in 1945, the leaders of the free world, Roosevelt and Churchill, legitimized the annexations by affirming Soviet ownership over the Polish and Romanian territories.

It was a cold-blooded betrayal for the Poles, who, unlike the Romanians who fought on the Germans’ side, suffered horribly under German occupation and heroically fought for independence. Roosevelt and Churchill destined the Poles to the horrors of Stalin’s mass-murdering tyranny for a half-century.

Hence, every time the Western leaders defend the territorial integrity of Ukraine, they reaffirm the immoral outcome of the Yalta conference. Western Ukraine does not belong to the Kiev regime, just as Eastern Ukraine is not Ukraine.

The West’s insistence on maintaining the status quo of the Ukrainian borders established by Lenin, Stalin and Hitler exposes the disconnect between strategic doctrine and moral principles.

Russians have determined that with its barbarous treatment of Russian-speaking and ethnically Russian areas since the color revolution of 2014 , Ukraine has forfeited any rights that it might ever have had to govern Russians and, again, there does not appear to be any reason to view Ukraine as a real country or to respect any boundaries involving Ukraine. Most likely is that Odessa and one or two other regions will shortly revert to Russian ownership , on top of the four regions which just now held referendums.

In fact, the one group of people on Earth who evince the very least amount of respect for Ukraine or its borders or territorial integrity are the NATO fops and neocon wankers who perpetrated the 2014 color Revolution in the first place and who have turned Ukraine into the planetary epicenter of every sort of transnational gangsterism , particularly money laundering , since that time.. Russia doesn't even get credit for that.