Thank you for participating! I will include your results in my table. I had hoped for some of this and would have liked to do the result evaluation. Maybe the topic was too difficult and I should have offered something easier. But I can extend it and animate a participation every now and then, until I have collected enough data. It doesn't run away. If you still know someone who would join in, I would be happy if you refer him to this article. So yes, it won't be lost and I will continue to maintain it.

I see you have grasped the idea and its potential. Yes, it's indeed a spectrum and bandwidth method that doesn't work in absolute categories, although it does include that, but at the same time the nuances.

I believe that people behave according to the set framework and always as wisely or as stupidly as the framework allows them to and believes they can. As in the Jerusalem game. People are naturally inclined to feed their dark shadows less if they are inspired and involved.

I am confident that a practical experiment can indeed prove the opposite and that people will not stick to their ideologies alone when they get the whole spectrum opened up and not just a road pointing left or right. Moreover, I believe that such must be repeatedly inserted into the personal space of experience so that the repeated participatory experience can establish a good impact.

You may think that the following has nothing to do with this topic but I think it has. I copy a comment of mine given this morning to another user in here:

Imagine an arena where wooden figures move and their rotating arms and legs could knock you down as you walk the parcours. They don't care, they keep spinning even if you haven't managed to escape a blow. If you get angry, you'll make more mistakes as you go through it, and every more punch will make you angrier. Imagine that these wooden figures symbolize those who don't know that they are wooden figures. However, it is clear to you that your anger is not caused by them, but arises within you because you are angry at yourself for having taken blows. None of the figures can change from wood to flesh if you stand there and try to convince them.

Now imagine that the arena is as big as your whole city. In addition to you, there are other players in the field who try to circumvent the figures. Some do it very elegantly and well, stroke the wooden extremities gently, almost never bump into anything, others are battered and angry and lament with almost every wooden figure they come up against. Still others seem to stand years in front of the same figure and persuade or smack it. They do not move on. Others have laid down to be spared from blows and movement, some of them turning to wood. Some of the wooden figures suddenly come to life and take part in the general game. They want to be part of this liveliness and hadn't been tied to a player for a long time who tried to fight them back incessantly.

Even the most elegant players lie down from time to time, even the angriest ones gently stroke a figure, even the weary have moments of skillful spontaneity, etc. Everything is included in constant change.

What do you think the other players want to see in you? What role model do you want to be for them?