A Current Narrative That Is Popular in The Media is that the United States National Anthem is White Supremacist... Really? I'm going to look as I write this.
I am struggling to recall any words to the National Anthem that are White Supremacist. Though it has been a long time since I've really looked in detail. I do know the National Anthem was basically a repurposed version that was different before it became the national anthem. Though I haven't actually investigated the lyrics in a long time.
I also haven't heard anyone ask them "which words" they just state it is white supremacist and I don't see people asking how, where, etc.?
So I am writing this rambling post and I want to check myself.
Here is the national anthem:
Oh, say can you see by the dawn's early light
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars thru the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
Oh, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
On the shore, dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected now shines in the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner! Oh long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion,
A home and a country should leave us no more!
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave'
From the terror of flight and the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war's desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
That there is the national anthem. Let's see. Is there anything white supremacist hidden in there?
Nope. I don't see a single reference to any race white, or otherwise anywhere in those lyrics.
So if that is white supremacist then pretty much ANYTHING can be white supremacist. Even breathing.
Oh there is one line in there:
No refuge could save the hireling and slave'
Which does not mention color. There have been white slaves in U.S. history, and all other skin tones. So this is not a white supremacist statement. Yet, if I were someone who had to try to spin anyone or anything I can possibly think of to push race baiting and division then that is something I might latch onto and try to spin. I'd be lying, but some people don't care whether they are ethical, truthful, or not as long as they are furthering their agenda.
The people who make the BEST case for white supremacy are those who whine about it all the time.
Just nod at them and smile.
"thank you...I could subjugate you totally...
...if I wanted too. My ancestors did and didn't break a sweat
or so YOU claim."
You ancestors did it because they had guns (first exposed to them by the Moors by the way- some history for you) and they did it to isolated groups. Yea they were great. Actually they got beat down on many occasion by (so-called) red men who did not even have guns other than the ones they took from your ancestors. It's normal to think that whatever type human you are that you are the best. As long as you keep to yourself no one would have a problem with it because no one would get hurt! It's only when the lawless ( and I'm not talking rules and regulations) take their idea out into the world that it actually becomes a problem. Oh, and what is the law? DO NO HARM.
Don't tell ME...tell them. I've read some history..thank you very much. The people you are apologizing for seem to think whites have superpowers.
I only wish.
No sorry I think I needed to say that to you.
reading comprehension problems...?
satire and sarcasm is beyond your ken?
you're not helping your cause much.
Please forgive the delay. No I read it fine. It's not my cause! If it were it would only concern me. That is part of the problem people thinking it is not a cause of concern for everyone in the states United.
If I am not mistaken it is not commonly thought that (so-called) white people are the ones that " whine about it all the time " therefor they are also not those people that you would be smiling and nodding too. Thank you by the way for your reply.
Europeans were actually first intoduced to guns from the east via the silk road, invading mongol armies or turkish armies, not from the Moors.
Moors are Turks also. They (Moors) were not homogenous. Mongols did not use firesticks.
Moors could refer to muslims as a whole, but it generally meant the north african muslims who invaded Spain. Other names were much more common for middle eastern muslims and turkish people. Mongols did incorperate gunpowder weapons into its army after their conquest of China.
I just happen to look back at this. Seeing when people make a reply is not the best feature of steemit. Please check your timeline. The Mongol conquest of the Song dynasty under Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294). The Spanish occupation by the Moors began in 711 AD and lasted 600 years to around 1211
I know, guns were not used in that confilct. Firearms were not invented until the 12th century in China and thus could not have spread to the middle east and europe before that.
The not-so-humorous irony of this topic is the fact that our country was fought and paid for by the lives of an already multicultural group of men. These men, some paid some not, fought to separate from a monarchy that was well prepared to send them to the gallows if captured.
When the foundation of our new government was created, that same group of men were determined to not allow a new kingdom to emerge. Protections and the means to enforce them were established in a Constitution that survives today.
Wars, separatists, insurgents, and civil unrest will not destroy the fabric of our nation regardless of how much bickering goes on. Apparently too many Americans do not understand nor appreciate the sacrifices that give them the very freedom to be offended. History tells us that the defeated knelt as a sign of obedience.
Was there anyone here before them or maybe they should just be forgotten after all most of them are gone. The Constitution is a well-written document but was it written for all of the people on the land? No, but all can use it now. Wars, separatists, insurgents that is how the union started should we end the same way?. Sometimes the truth is hard to take so we kill the messenger, and it is easier to say forget than for some to do it. But not for those unaffected physically or emotionally. The only way to stand united is to redress grievances which is why it is in the Constitution. Or you can just forget about it, but then you must also forget about United We (all) Stand. Or maybe you did not mean all of us. I did not write this to start a conflict. I write hoping you might get a glimpse of the other side. I believe that we must keep our face towards truth regardless of hurt feeling. Or we defile all that is good. We all must pick a side truth or error. Also don't forget that the problem is made bigger because it serves the pupose of the elite. Divide in order to conqure the trap that is always set for the people.
Anyone who wants to be offended will be offended.
It doesn't seem to matter if there is no fact, no reason or no logic behind the purported offense.
Haters gonna hate....and it's sad.
Funny thing is they are the ones yelling about "hate speech", and protesting against hate.
While they do what?
Hate.
It's like wresting a pig in mud.
If you do, all you get is messy and the pig enjoys it too.
Not worth the fight
My view is if I even reach one person. It was worth it.
Some of this is just to stupid to comment back on.
Yet you clearly did.
I also don't know if you meant my writing was stupid, or the videos, or all of the above. ;)
This was a case of get in where you fit in. I don't even think I read your comment... My Bad!
I do not recall that version being sung in....since grade school....never on public sports event that I have seen on TV.
Then I don't really watch TV...
:-)
Now it is the home of wage slave, that do not even know they are slaves...IMHO.
Namaste.
They have gone insane. They think its cool with the whole black power stuff. Their parents actually had something to fight for, and blacks got every rights the white man had. But he couldnt do anything with it. 50 years later and they are just fucking up what their grandfathers fought for. With your gangstah rap, killing eachother, splitting up families. Ya playin yaself, blacks.
This is where history and knowledge of the present comes in. I can only imagine how funk up my rep will be after the comment I make on this post. But unlike most I really don't care about any moneys that might come from posting. ((A rap video really?)) This comes from not knowing history. Most rap is stupid today (but that was not always the case) You have never heard any of the early works. All you hear is the crap that the record companies put out, but that another story altogether. As for as
This comes from not knowing American history you probably would say that about the (so called) red man if there were enough of them left to make a difference . Most (so-called) white people think after the civil war (so-called) Black people where free to do what ever they felt they needed to do. This is far from the truth! The KKK was still in effect, and if I am mistaken please correct me. The (so-called) Black people were given the right to govern themselves but was quickly taken away, there were Jim crow laws that were in place up until the mid '60. Also in the 50 there was redlining a bank policy that made it impossible for(so called) black people to get lone to start businesses. Well that's a lot of missing time for boot strapping (pulling yourself up by your boot strap) Kinda of hard when you take away the straps. When you consider the civil war ended in 1865 ( that a hundred years) and there were still Jim Crow laws in the south one hundred years later. Of cause it was not like that all over the U.S. in the west the (so-called) Black people did well in what was called Black Wall St. Well they did will until there town was bomb. That is an interesting story, but it is only for those with open eyes. What I think needs to be done must be done on both side.
via the currency. Or else why have cryptocurrency?
The problem is most don't know where the real fight is. (( In order to drive my rep down farther I intend to do a post on this which I started, but then stop and started to read comments and felt the need to reply. I got good news for most, I'm going to stop commenting now and get back to my post. I invite you all to cuss me out as you see fit. :)
You look white and you have probably farted so you are definitely a white supremacist...
In fact there is a photo of you online - I can tell it's you because of the beard.
And you look like you are farting...
That is me on a good day. :)
nice one upvoted and always will <3
Those who wish to find fault will find it, those same ones would tell Jesus he is racist and you can bet God is unknown to them also.
We have a heart problem in America, all they know is what media or someone else tells them, they can't think for themselves and most never learned to reason either, and don't get me started on their lacking common sense...
With this statement it's kinda of hard to understand who you are talking about. In other words it can be said of both side.
Since I have started regarding everything these people say or do as a lie, I have saved myself countless hours of research by just assuming the exact opposite of what they say
98% success rate (calculated at WAG speed ;>)
Are you talking about the major media? Because the statement is perfect for them, unless they are saying what you want to hear.
yup, talking about the major media, AKA the Ministry of Truth. I still fact check stuff coming out of the alt-Right sources...even though I occasionally do let something slip that I should have verified
Your post up is impressive. Followed @dwinblood