i've got no problem with socialism IF IT'S voluntary :D just leave me out of it lol and those who also want to peacefully opt out and have nothing to do with it.. but it never works like that does it? haha
i've got no problem with socialism IF IT'S voluntary :D just leave me out of it lol and those who also want to peacefully opt out and have nothing to do with it.. but it never works like that does it? haha
Hehe, yes, but voluntary socialism will implode very quickly, by a tragedy of the commons scenario:
So people are either way individualists, wherer they believe it or not, there is no question about that. So when they say socialism, they actually mean theft from the rich.
If there are only poor people sharing wealth, then that will implode quickly, as nobody will work if the other guy is getting free welfare.
It is always a host vs parasite system, and that is why socialism will only work if it's done by force, until the host is depleted, the parasite moves to another body.
The socialist has depleted all east europe and soviet union, now he is moving to the USA.
@doitvoluntarily
Voluntary socialism doesn't exist. It is an oxymoron. Voluntary communism, however, can exist. These terms often get mixed. Pure communism is voluntary commune living. It is very rare, and I doubt it will work for very long, but it can technically exist in a voluntary society.
There are certain mini communes in society today that have shared ownership of certain things, such as families often sharing forks, spoons, knives and such.
Not even on small scale.
I remember when I was in college, we lived 3 in an apartment, and we had to share 1 phone, damnit, you should have seen how many times we fought over it.
I bet most domestic violence happens because 1 spouse is recklessly spending money. If only they would separate their wallets and each person should spend on their own, then it would be much better. And fuck allimony.
Only private property makes sense, both in small, as in large scale.