You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Tolerant Person Eats The Poisoned Candy Too
haha, very nice. Not sure I 100% agree with the underlying message but I still appreciate the humour.
haha, very nice. Not sure I 100% agree with the underlying message but I still appreciate the humour.
What is there not to agree? It is 100% logical.
Fair enough, taken as a completely standalone simple comic then yes it's a 100% logical that given a bowl of candy, one of which is poisoned, a person that wished to consume the entire bowl of candy would eventually eat the poison candy. However I fail to see the link between tolerance and eating a whole bowl of candy that you know to be poisoned. That would be stupidity not tolerance. Therefore you are arguing that tolerance=stupidity. That's a premise I don't agree with.
They believe that tolerance is some kind of a virtue. They believe they are virtuous when they are undermining their own country.
Tolerance is an Orwellian idea designed to pressure people into accepting that which they don't accept.
Awesome comic, looking forward to more :)
That's not true. For instance, I don't accept the premise of your cartoon, however I can still tolerate it and your point of view, even if different to mine, I can even find the cartoon funny :). So tolerance does not equal acceptance.
Calling someone intolerant is a personal attack and an Orwellian idea that leftists use. If you don't like my cartoons you don't have to like them or even tolerate them. You are not intolerant if you don't like or tolerate my cartoons. You are free. Who the hell is anyone to tell you what you can and can not like? Just tell them to go to hell if regressive leftists tell you that.
Well literally speaking you are intolerant if you don't tolerate my cartoons, but that's like saying you are a baby killer if you eat eggs for breakfast.